Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-09-07
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In todays era , their is an argument between two thoughts such as , some individuals believe that it is beneficial to share as much as information possible in scientific research, marketing trends and the educational world . but , other people argue that information is too crucial too be shared easily . I strongly believe that information should not be freely handed.
This essay will be elucidate with different exemplify and ideas .
Firstly, structured data plays a vital role in contemporary society, giving information about different aspects such as medical background ,academic and businesses can boost the upliftment of the people .moreover, individuals can also get ideas about the research methodology. Additionally , it can assist the well being of the society and also gives financial security for the people .
on the other hand , showcasing the data to general public or giving complete information to the individual can effect the global research . for instance, the information provided freely can be misused by the public . however, the data holds different concepts that should not be given access easily because the people examines the data and also it can be illegally used . however the government should not give facilities to general public which holds valuables .
In conclusion, structured data is beneficial for general public. But data should not be shared freely to the individuals . the argue of the people is surge more in todays world . from my perspective , I believe that hard earned data should not be given easy access for the people .
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is limited. While you mention that sharing information can boost 'upliftment' and that restricted access prevents misuse, these points are not fully extended with specific, concrete examples. The essay relies on general statements rather than detailed explanation. To improve, you should provide more specific scenarios—for instance, discussing how open-source medical research during a pandemic might save lives versus the risks of intellectual property theft in corporate sectors. The position is clear, but the supporting arguments lack the depth required for a higher band score.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organised into paragraphs, which is a positive step. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate. For example, the transition 'This essay will be elucidate with different exemplify and ideas' is grammatically incorrect and awkward. While you use linking words like 'Firstly', 'Moreover', and 'On the other hand', the flow between sentences is sometimes disjointed. The referencing is occasionally unclear, particularly in the second body paragraph where the connection between 'the people examines the data' and the conclusion is weak. Improving the variety and accuracy of your linking phrases will help the essay flow more naturally.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks precision and sophistication. You use some basic terms repeatedly, such as 'information' and 'data'. There are also issues with word choice and collocation, such as 'boost the upliftment' and 'the argue of the people is surge'. These errors occasionally make the meaning slightly opaque. To reach a higher band, you should aim to use more precise academic vocabulary and collocations, such as 'intellectual property', 'transparency', or 'proprietary information', rather than relying on general terms. Spelling and word-form errors, such as 'elucidate' used incorrectly as a verb in this context, also limit the score.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede communication. Common issues include subject-verb agreement ('their is an argument'), incorrect word forms ('too crucial too be shared'), and punctuation errors (spaces before commas). The sentence structure is often repetitive, and the attempt at complex sentences frequently results in errors, such as 'the information provided freely can be misused by the public . however, the data holds different concepts that should not be given access easily'. Focusing on basic sentence accuracy and proofreading for common errors like 'their/there' and 'to/too' will significantly improve your clarity.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.