Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-09-27

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 7.0)

Opinions differ regarding how information should be disclosed. While some people believe that it is good to share more facts as much as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world for more accurate results, I believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely because it can put subjects' financial accounts in danger.

A particularly noteworthy benefit of oversharing information in scientific research is its potential to produce more precise results. This can be largely attributed to the fact that most researchers use the information they get to make a general overview of a particular field. This means that, if researchers are given more information, they are likely to make a precise conclusion rather than relying on a general overview. This can be exemplified by medical practitioners carrying out research on the effects of COVID-19 disease. If they are given more information, they are likely to get more definite results, which can be used for medical purposes.

Nevertheless, it would be unrealistic to overlook the fact that disclosing too much information can be risky, since the shared information can put individuals' lives in danger. This is particularly concerning because hackers may use information from online surveys to hack people's bank accounts, thereby stealing money from the respective accounts. By having access to people's personal data, hackers are better positioned to retrieve and use them for their personal gain. In practical terms some surveys require an individual to fill in personal details such as phone number, full names, and other details, which can be used to swap individuals' personal accounts. As a consequence, participants' finances may be unsafe.

In conclusion, although some people believe that it is good to share more information on scientific research, business and the academic world for more accurate results, I think some data is too important or too valuable to be shared freely because it can put respondents' financial accounts in danger.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views on sharing information freely in scientific research, business, and academia, while also providing a clear personal opinion. The writer's position is maintained throughout the essay. The ideas are extended and supported, such as when discussing medical research into COVID-19, although the counter-argument regarding financial accounts introduces a slightly narrow perspective on 'business and academic' information by focusing heavily on individual online surveys and hackers. Nevertheless, the main tenets of the prompt are covered adequately, and the arguments are logically presented, aligning well with the requirements for a Band 6.5 or 7.0. Because the position is clear and all parts of the prompt are addressed with relevant supporting examples, this performance satisfies the Band 7 criteria.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay displays a clear logical organisation and progression throughout. Each paragraph has a distinct focus: the introduction outlines the topic and stance, the second body paragraph explores the benefits of sharing information in research, the third body paragraph examines the risks regarding personal security, and the conclusion summarises the main points. Cohesive devices are used reasonably well to guide the reader through the text, such as 'A particularly noteworthy benefit', 'Nevertheless', and 'As a consequence'. Paragraphing is used appropriately, and referencing throughout the response is generally clear, meaning the overall progression of ideas flows smoothly from start to finish. This performance meets the expectations for a Band 7.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision, employing appropriate terms such as 'noteworthy benefit', 'practitioners', 'overshadow', and 'respectictive accounts'. There are attempts to use less common lexical items related to research and data privacy. However, there are some minor vocabulary and collocation inaccuracies, such as writing 'the effects of COVID-19 disease' rather than simply 'COVID-19', and repeating phrases like 'more information' and 'financial accounts'. Despite these minor limitations, the vocabulary is adequate to convey the intended meaning clearly without impeding the reader's understanding, fitting the Band 6 descriptor well.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 7.0

The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional structures ('If they are given more information, they are likely to...') and relative clauses. There is a good variety of complex structures used throughout the response. Grammatical control is generally quite good, with many error-free sentences, though a few minor awkward phrases occur, such as 'share more facts as much as possible'. Punctuation is handled properly, and errors are infrequent enough that they do not impede communication at all. The overall grammatical control and variety of structures support a solid Band 7 performance.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.