Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-09-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

Both these veiws are true some people believe that it is beneficial to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too significant or too valuable to be shared freely. From my perspective,it is important to share information about your business, research or academic world to someone truesty such us your brother and friend who is loyal to you.

Supports who believe that "it is beneficial to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world" think if your information spread to someone else it is save.In that case if you lose it by mistake you are able to get it again. Furthermore,It is also significant to insure your security. For example, if you have an important document in your laptop and your laptop resats all the data so you are able to get all the data if you shared it with other.

On the other hand, proponents of others who believe that "some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely" think that if In case the person with which he shared information become their compatitor and leck all their important information he loses his secrets.For example, in case my friend fight with me and share all the data with my oponends so i have alot of lose.

In conclusion, if someone has his honest friend or a brother so initialy he want to check his honesty and then he want to share his information with him.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource4.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy4.0
Overall4.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views—the benefits of sharing scientific, business, and academic information freely versus the need to protect valuable data—and attempts to provide an opinion. However, the interpretation of the prompt is somewhat shifted towards personal friendships and family relationships rather than institutional, commercial, or scientific contexts. For instance, the student argues that information should be shared 'to someone truesty such us your brother and friend.' While ideas are presented, they are limited and under-developed, relying on simplistic examples such as losing data if a laptop resets. This places the response comfortably at Band 5.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay is organized into four paragraphs, showing a clear attempt at a traditional essay structure with an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, the overall progression is weakened by repetitive phrasing and weak cohesive ties. Transitional phrases like 'Supports who believe that' and 'proponents of others who believe that' are awkward and unnatural. Furthermore, referencing is frequently unclear, such as pronoun shifts ('the person with which he shared information become their compatitor'). Paragraphing is present, but internal cohesion is faulty, characteristic of a Band 5 performance.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.0

The vocabulary used is basic and repetitive, with numerous spelling and word-choice errors that occasionally impede understanding. Examples of errors include 'veiws' for views, 'truesty' for trustworthy, 'resats' for resets, 'compatitor' for competitor, 'leck' for leak, 'oponends' for opponents, and 'lose' for loss. While the student attempts to use less common vocabulary like 'significant', 'proponents', and 'beneficial', the high frequency of basic lexical and spelling errors restricts the score to Band 4.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0

The text displays a very limited range of sentence structures, relying mostly on simple and flawed complex sentences. There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the response, such as missing articles, incorrect prepositions, tense inconsistencies, and faulty subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'if your information spread to someone else it is save', 'if you have an important document in your laptop and your laptop resats all the data so you are able to get all the data if you shared it with other'). These errors are frequent and often cause difficulty for the reader, fitting the Band 4 descriptor.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.