Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Unquestionably, every coin has two sides and so the peoples. Society's people are divided into two main groups and therefore, many individuals thinks that it is beneficial to share as much information you can in all three major aspects of life, such as scientific research, workplaces, and educational world. On the other hand many think that some information are too valuable to share freely we may face concequences in a long-term. This become a topic of debate among peope. This essay will compare and contrast both of the opinion along with my opinion. Which is in th favour of former view will be discussed in a sensibe conclusion.

Initiating with the points supporting first school of thought, firstly it is beneficial to share information you know that may assist many people realted to same issue. For example if someoe is working in a space resarch and he want to know or gain information on a topic. He do not know he can seak help of internet. Similarly if someone is starting a career in business and he faces some difficulties it is better to assist a expert in field rather then spending his time and money on a filed he do not know.

On its constrasting side,people who held another viewpoit thinks that it is not always good to share everything. Sometimes we may have to face concequences if they leads to some evils people. For instance if someone get to know some important information or even a paper of school or any institute he may use it againt them that maybe lead to a crime.

In conlusion, i would like to say that it is good to share informative information that may help anyone in needs. However it will depend upon the mindset of people that which view they are in favour of.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses the prompt by discussing both views on sharing research and business information, and includes a concluding personal opinion. However, the development of ideas remains limited and under-developed. For instance, the arguments regarding space research and business difficulties are overly brief and lack sufficient explanation or concrete details. The position is stated, but the support provided throughout the body paragraphs is basic and generalized. To achieve a higher level, the writer would need to fully extend and support each viewpoint with well-developed, coherent examples that thoroughly explore the implications of free information sharing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay presents some basic organization and attempts to use introductory and transitional phrases such as 'Initiating with the points supporting first school of thought' and 'On its constrasting side'. However, there is no clear overall progression of ideas, and the logical flow is frequently disrupted by awkward transitions and repetitive sentence patterns. Cohesive devices are sometimes inaccurate or mechanical, and paragraphing, while present, lacks smooth internal cohesion. Referencing is occasionally unclear, such as the ambiguous pronoun use in 'if they leads to some evils people'. Improving logical progression and utilizing a wider, more natural range of cohesive ties would enhance the structure.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary is limited but minimally adequate to convey basic ideas. There are noticeable errors in word choice, form, and spelling throughout the text, such as 'peoples' instead of people, 'concequences', 'peope', 'seak' for seek, 'realted', 'onsumming', 'aids', and 'in conlusion'. Attempts to use less common vocabulary often result in awkward collocations or incorrect word forms, which occasionally cause some difficulty for the reader. To improve, the writer should focus on expanding their working vocabulary, refining word choices to suit the academic register, and carefully checking spelling and word forms before submission.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response demonstrates a limited range of grammatical structures, relying heavily on simple sentences alongside poorly controlled attempts at complex clauses. There are frequent errors in basic grammar, including subject-verb agreement ('many individuals thinks', 'some information are'), article usage ('in a sensibe conclusion'), and prepositional patterns. Sentence boundaries are occasionally blurred, leading to run-on phrases and punctuation issues. These frequent errors can cause difficulty for the reader in places. To reach higher bands, the writer must demonstrate better control over complex sentence patterns, ensure consistent agreement, and reduce the density of basic grammatical slips.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.