Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Nowadays, individuals assume that it s good to share more informaton as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. On contrast that some information is so valuable that it can not shared freely. In this eassy , will discuss about the information what how much information need to need to reveal.

On one hand, there are some group of individuals believe that information should reveal to the academic world because of that people can gain knowledge about scientific research, business, and differnt types of areas. It is good to know about information to acknowledge the consequence of the research and the whole procedure. For example when a reseracher work on a project on atomic power. Therefore, people who lives at that area should have a vast knowledge about the consequence of it's any kind of wrong exploitation.

On the another hand, it is not a great idea to explore all the things in public because all the people in the world are not in well-mannered. People who have bad intention n future to do any detrimential things will gain knowledge from this resources and will have a negative impact on society which will have a worst impact on young generation as well. For instance, scientis has a project on any specific group or any crucial work where they measure different types of theory and valubale work for that project. If this sustainal things will be found by the unethical group of people it will be create a bad impact on nations.

I believe that the information should explore as much it need to inform people for know to results, consequences, causes, effects. We know that all the information is not essential for us do . Although, there are a group of people who has always negative intentions for nations. So the more it's revealed the nore they get chance to do wrong occurances. There should be a limitation of everythings. When we all follow the rules and regulations, we all can get the benefits from it.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both views and give a personal position: you support sharing information needed to inform people, while arguing that sensitive material should be limited. The discussion of public knowledge about the consequences of atomic power is relevant, as is the concern that harmful groups could misuse research. However, the position is not fully clear or consistently expressed, especially in the introduction, where “will discuss about the information what how much information need to need to reveal” does not establish a clear argument. Several examples remain general or incomplete, and the reasons for deciding what should be shared are not developed. State your position directly and explain the benefits and risks with more specific, connected examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. The signposts “On one hand” and “On the another hand” help readers follow the contrast, and the final paragraph returns to your opinion. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow. For example, “For example when a reseracher work on a project on atomic power. Therefore…” leaves the example as a fragment before moving to its consequence. Some links are mechanical or unclear, and references such as “this resources” and “this sustainal things” make it hard to identify what is being discussed. Build each paragraph around one clear claim, then connect its explanation and example explicitly.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “scientific research,” “consequence,” “exploitation,” “negative impact,” and “rules and regulations.” These choices show an attempt to discuss both the benefits and risks of sharing information. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, sometimes making the meaning unclear: “information should reveal,” “bad intention,” and “wrong occurances” do not express the intended ideas naturally. Spelling errors such as “informaton,” “eassy,” “differnt,” and “valubale” are also noticeable. Aim for precise topic vocabulary and check spelling; using familiar words accurately is more effective than forcing complex expressions.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including clauses with “because” and “where,” and the overall meaning can usually be followed. However, errors occur frequently, and attempts at longer structures are often faulty. Examples include “it can not shared freely,” “a reseracher work,” and “people who lives,” which show problems with verb forms and subject–verb agreement. The introduction also contains an incomplete construction: “In this eassy, will discuss…” In addition, sentence boundaries and punctuation need attention, as in “For example when…” followed by a separate “Therefore” sentence. Practise building accurate sentences first, then add subordinate clauses and check each sentence for a subject and a correctly formed verb.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.