Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-07
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Nowadays, some people believe to share information freely in scientifc research, business, and academic world. However, others believe that sharing information can be valuable and risk taking too but valuable information can be protected. Information can be generally beneficial and valuable too, but commerically and private information can not be shared and it is important to protect those information.
Firstly, sharing information can help society in progress and ideas can lead to its development like scientifc research, researchers can help eachother to make discoveries, medicines, scientifc data and many more things. Sharing information can help the nation to grow not only this but university students can use this as major impact in their academic knowledge through, sharing information they can improve their research and grow in their field. Moreover, by sharing data they can do their research work more quickly by using different AI tools. For example, in medical research if one scientist can share its findings, other researchers can use those information to develop treatments more quickly.
Secondly, not all information should be freely available some information should be kept private like financial information, comeptetive or security value. These information carry siginificant value and it can be harmful for any organization if given freely. Companies spend huge amount of money in developing products if their competitors get to know about all of those seceret values and information they can easily target that company which can effect company and produce bad consequences which can result in reduce innovations and discourage company from investing in research. For instance, a company can not share any information until its product is launched this can result in more development and in country's growth too.
Therefore, Information should generally be shared because it promotes progress and cooperation, but information that is commercially valuable, confidential, or potentially harmful should be protected
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
You address both sides of the discussion and give a clear overall position: information should generally be shared, while commercially valuable, confidential, or harmful material should be protected. The examples about researchers sharing medical findings and companies protecting product information are relevant and help explain your reasoning. This meets the task well, but the development is uneven: the benefits of sharing are supported with several points, whereas the case for protecting information relies mainly on commercial competition. The opening also briefly blurs the distinction between information being valuable and the risks of sharing it. To strengthen the response, explain more precisely when openness benefits society and when confidentiality is justified, and extend the examples with clearer consequences or evidence. Your conclusion effectively restates your position, though it could synthesise both arguments more explicitly.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a coherent overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a concluding position. Sequencing is generally easy to follow, and signposts such as “Firstly,” “Secondly,” and “Therefore” make the progression clear. Some cohesion is mechanical, however, and ideas within paragraphs occasionally run together. For example, the first body paragraph moves from scientific discoveries to national growth, university learning, and AI tools without clearly showing how each point connects. References such as “those information” and “this” are not always clear, while repeated use of “sharing information can help” makes the links feel formulaic. Use more varied transitions and make each paragraph’s central claim explicit, then connect examples directly to that claim.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “scientific research,” “financial information,” “competitors,” “confidential,” and “innovations,” so the main ideas are understandable. There are also attempts at more specific phrasing, such as “commercially valuable” and “security value.” However, the range and control are uneven: several expressions are inaccurate or awkward, including “risk taking too,” “competitive or security value,” and “bad consequences.” Spelling errors such as “scientifc,” “commerically,” “comeptetive,” and “seceret” are noticeable and reduce precision. Some words are repeated, particularly “information” and “sharing.” Build a more reliable set of collocations for this topic and proofread spelling; precise choices such as “sensitive data” or “protect intellectual property” would make the argument clearer.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including conditional structures such as “if one scientist can share its findings” and a longer explanation of how competitors might affect a company. The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but errors in sentence construction and grammatical forms occur across the response. For example, “some people believe to share information” needs a different verb pattern, and “these information” has incorrect agreement and number. The sentence beginning “Moreover, by sharing data…” is awkwardly punctuated, while “which can effect company” has problems with articles and clause construction. Several long sentences would be clearer if divided or carefully restructured. Practise accurate verb patterns, singular/plural agreement, articles, and punctuation while retaining a mix of sentence types.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.