Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

There is an ongoing debate over whether it is beneficial to share more information about scientific, business and the academic world, others argue that some information is essential and valuable that should not be shared freely. Although both perspectives have some merit, I firmly believe that some critical information should be kept secret and shared openly because it can be used in harmful ways.

On the one hand, some people believe that sharing information is significant mainly because some people can use that information in a beneficial way. Excessive knowledge about various topics helps individuals to innovate different products. For example, scientific information allows university students to prepare their research documents effectively. Moreover, students may be able to publish their research articles, which can help future generations. Therefore, sharing information plays a crucial role in advancement of various fields.

On the other hand, others argue that valuable information should be shared carefully. This is particularly because many people can use some vital information for detrimental purposes. For instance, an individual may use sensitive information to make some kind of drugs or poisons that can affect mankind. Furthermore, some people can use important information for other intentions like blackmail and frauds. Consequently, it is essential to analyze what kind of information should not be shared openly.

In conclusion, although some people believe that sharing information is good, others argue that some information is too valuable to share freely. After considering both perspectives, I strongly believe that some important information should not shared openly.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the discussion and state a clear position: some information should not be shared openly because it could be used harmfully. The two body paragraphs are relevant, with examples involving research and the misuse of sensitive information. However, the arguments are not developed equally or in much detail. The benefits paragraph focuses mainly on students and research articles, rather than explaining more broadly how openness supports scientific progress, business, or academic collaboration. The risks paragraph gives examples of drugs, poisons, blackmail, and fraud, but does not clarify what kinds of information should be restricted or how to balance openness with protection. Develop each point with a clearer explanation and a specific, relevant example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Signposting such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” makes the progression easy to follow, and the ideas within each paragraph generally relate to its main point. This meets the lower-band expectations and shows some features of stronger organisation. However, the linking can feel formulaic, and the opening sentence joins two contrasting claims with a comma, making the relationship between them less clear. Some references are also broad, such as “that information” and “some vital information.” Use a wider range of natural transitions and make links between claims and examples more explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for the topic, including “innovation,” “publish,” “detrimental purposes,” and “blackmail and frauds.” These choices help communicate both the benefits and risks of sharing information, and attempts at less common vocabulary are evident. Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or imprecise, however. “Excessive knowledge” does not naturally express the intended benefit, “make some kind of drugs” is vague, and “frauds” is less natural in this context than “fraud.” The repeated use of “information,” “important,” and “some” also limits flexibility. Aim for more precise topic vocabulary and check whether less familiar expressions sound natural in context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including subordinate clauses beginning “because” and “which,” and most sentences communicate their meaning clearly. There are some grammatical errors, but they rarely prevent understanding. For example, the introduction joins two independent clauses with a comma, and the final sentence needs “should not be shared,” rather than “should not shared.” The phrase “in advancement of various fields” also needs an article (“in the advancement”) or a different construction. Review sentence boundaries, passive verb forms, and article use. Greater accuracy in these areas, alongside your existing attempts at complex sentences, would make the response more controlled.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.