Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Information are usually important knowledge about something which could be essential for a number of things like research, business adventures and in the academic world as well. These are part of the reasons the world is changing with more developments and technological inventions.

Proper release of information is relevant for conducting scientific researches as well as other forms of researches. When inaccurate information is given out, there tend to be erros in data collection and final outcome. These researches are usually carried out with consents from participants and personal information kept confidential and most times the partipants are not revealed.

However, some information could be very vital and personal and could pose threat to the person giving them out, or maybe give them a sense of guilt, that make some information withheld. Some personal questions and topics may feel very uncomfortable to discuss, especially in a face to face interview, where the participant may feel embarrassed to answer some certain question and may resort to givind out wrong information or may not give details of their personal experiences and opinions.For these reasons, the use of questionniers were preffered to other forms of data collection. This method keeps the targeted audience anonymous and the outcome becomes more accurate.

Moreover, I believe that giving accurate information for any form of research is always good for better results and outcomes. Taking part in these exercises are usually not compulsory, hence i suggest that if one is not disposed to giving the accurate information needed can just refuse politely and not get involved initially.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address the topic by discussing the value of accurate research information and reasons some personal information may be withheld, then state that participation should be voluntary. However, the two views in the prompt are not fully represented: the response focuses mainly on research participants’ privacy rather than the broader case for sharing information in science, business and academia or the value of protecting commercially or academically valuable knowledge. Your position is present, but “giving accurate information … is always good” does not clearly resolve when information should or should not be shared. Develop both sides with specific examples, such as open scientific findings versus confidential business data, and explain your own position in relation to both.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph about research, a contrasting paragraph about sensitive information, and a concluding opinion. Connectors such as “However,” “Moreover,” and “For these reasons” help signal relationships between ideas. Nevertheless, progression is not consistently clear because the discussion shifts from sharing valuable information to research methods and participant anonymity, without explicitly linking these points to the prompt’s wider contexts. The final paragraph also introduces voluntary participation without fully drawing together the two views. Use topic sentences that directly identify each side of the debate, and make references such as “these exercises” more precise so readers can follow the argument without having to infer the connection.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “data collection,” “confidential,” “anonymous,” and “accurate information,” which helps communicate the research context. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “pose threat” and “targeted audience.” However, the range is limited and several choices or collocations are inaccurate or repetitive, including “information are,” “business adventures,” and “some certain question.” Spelling errors such as “erros,” “partipants,” “givind,” “questionniers,” and “preffered” are noticeable and reduce the overall control of vocabulary. Build a more precise range for the actual debate, including terms for open access, intellectual property, commercial confidentiality, and research findings, and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, including a conditional construction in “When inaccurate information is given out…” and a relative clause in “where the participant may feel embarrassed.” Meaning is generally recoverable, but errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction occur across the response. For example, “Information are” should use a singular verb, “there tend to be” does not agree with the intended construction, and “that make some information withheld” is grammatically unclear. The sentence beginning “For these reasons” also contains a faulty tense and passive form. Practise checking subject–verb agreement and forming clauses accurately, then use punctuation to separate long sentences and avoid run-on structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.