Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-09
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
It is mostly argued, that it is a good practice to share as much information as possible the field of scientific research, buisnessess and the educational world. But there are people, which believe that some selective information should be kept private because its too vaulable to be shown freely.
In my point of view, the more we share useful information with society and the people living in it the better it is.
First off, a lot of new advancements in technology, scientific research and buisnesses has created better living conditions. People expect the specialists in these fields to share useful information that would be useful to a large number of populations. Sharing information that is helpful to human kind is counted as a good deed. for Example, if a ground breaking
discovery of treating cancer emerges and the scientists decide to let the world know about its treatment and procedures then a lot of lives could be saved. As a result, the world could become a better place if we share useful information that can help improve anothers life.
Secondly, generating useful information is very costly and requires a lot of equipment and careful monitoring to prevent any accidents. Not all scientists are given the same opportunities, some are better equipped than others. So, a lot of pay is needed to keep research work going. If the right information lands in the wrong hands, then it may cause a lot of complications. For instance, someone who likes to prank their class fellows may use some harmful chemicals that they did not know of and can cause damage to both themselves and others without knowing the right way to use them. As a result causing accidents.
In conclusion, there are both advantages and disadvantages of sharing information on the scientifc, educational, and buisness sector. But i believe the advantages outweigh the disadvantages by a whole lot.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both sides of the discussion and state a clear view: “the more we share useful information … the better it is.” The cancer-treatment example supports the benefits of sharing, while the chemicals example illustrates risks when information is misused. However, the two sides are not developed equally. The case for sharing is explained in more detail, whereas the opposing view focuses mainly on accidental harm and does not fully explore why information may be valuable or deliberately protected in research, business, or education. Your conclusion repeats your position but could draw together the discussion more precisely. To strengthen the response, explain the reasons for protecting information and connect each example more directly to the task’s different fields.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a stated opinion, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphs generally have a clear central focus, and signposts such as “First off,” “Secondly,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the sequence. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes mechanical, particularly with repeated “As a result” transitions, and some links between claims are not fully clear. For example, the point that research is costly is followed by the risk of information reaching the wrong hands, but the relationship between these ideas needs explaining. The opening also uses “But” to begin a new paragraph without a clear connection. Develop smoother links between claims and examples, and use referencing that makes each relationship explicit.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “scientific research,” “advancements in technology,” “ground breaking discovery,” and “harmful chemicals.” There are also attempts at more specific phrasing, such as “careful monitoring” and “equipped.” However, spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable, including “buisnessess,” “vaulable,” and “scientifc,” and some expressions are awkward or imprecise: “a large number of populations” and “a lot of pay is needed.” Repetition of “useful information” also limits flexibility. Aim for accurate collocations and a wider range of terms for sharing, protecting, and applying knowledge; proofreading spelling would make your vocabulary more reliable.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional structures such as “if … the scientists decide … then a lot of lives could be saved” and a relative clause in “information that is helpful to human kind.” Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors occur. For example, “a lot of new advancements … has created” has a subject–verb agreement problem, and “people, which believe” uses an unsuitable relative pronoun. The opening comma in “It is mostly argued, that” is also unnecessary, while “As a result causing accidents” is an incomplete sentence. Work on agreement, relative clauses, and complete sentence construction, and check punctuation around introductory phrases. Greater accuracy across these structures would make the argument easier to follow.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.