Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-09
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Some people arguing that infromation shouldn't be share with anyone and share only upto business and academic world. while, some has thoughts that information should share to every one.
As we know every information is too much important according to work and some people do not want to leak it with other people because of their secuirty issue and they want to keep it upto their own self and use it as much as require. For example last year some inforamtion was leak from company in the form of copode annd they face huge drawback in amount 23 billion dollar. Moreover some leak information can face you with huge loss. consequently it is good for every one to keep info upto their own self it can save them from differebt types harms in the career.
On another hand, other individuals belief that share information to every one specially ypu own employers can make eas to their life and especially to new employee and worker. This can enhance the work experience which is can proven good for company to rise productivity. for exmaple share knowledge with someone can lead them toward good and quailty work. In addition has it no high harm to or deffect to share information. sharing information can also bost your knowledge as well.
In conclusion, i think saving information as much improtant as sharing. this both has both effect positive and negative wh should share those information which can't deffect our work or company moreover we shouldn't share thos info whic is secret but opinion are good on their own place
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 4.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.5 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You address both views and give a personal position: you explain concerns about security and financial loss, then describe how sharing knowledge may help employees and productivity. The example of a company losing money after information was leaked is relevant, although the unclear wording makes its significance difficult to understand. Your conclusion offers a sensible distinction between information that can be shared and confidential material. However, the discussion remains limited: the benefits of sharing in scientific research and the academic world are not really explored, and several claims, such as sharing having “no high harm,” are not supported or qualified. Develop each side with clearer, more specific reasoning and make your position explicit throughout.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable structure, with an opening, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. This helps readers identify the broad direction of the argument. However, progression within paragraphs is often difficult to follow because ideas are loosely connected or repeated. For example, the first body paragraph moves from security concerns to a company loss and then to general career harms without clearly explaining the links. Connectors such as “Moreover,” “consequently,” and “On another hand” are attempted, but some are awkward or do not show the relationship precisely. Use clearer topic sentences, develop one main point at a time, and make references such as “this” and “it” unambiguous.
Lexical Resource: Band 4.5
You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “security issue,” “productivity,” “knowledge,” and “company,” so the general subject is identifiable. However, the range is basic and repetitive, and frequent spelling and word-choice errors sometimes strain understanding. Examples include “infromation,” “secuirty,” “copode,” and “quailty”; phrases such as “keep info upto their own self” and “huge drawback in amount” are also unclear or unnatural. Several words are repeated rather than replaced with more precise alternatives. Build a reliable set of terms for confidentiality, sharing research, and commercial value, and check spelling and collocations carefully. More accurate vocabulary would make your examples and reasoning much easier to follow.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5
You attempt to express reasons and consequences, and there are some longer sentence forms, but the range is limited and complex attempts are often faulty. For example, “Some people arguing that information shouldn't be share” lacks a correctly formed main verb and passive construction, while “This can enhance the work experience which is can proven good” contains several problems with clause structure and verb forms. Agreement and sentence boundaries are also inconsistent, as in “some has thoughts” and the opening fragment beginning “while.” Capitalisation and punctuation errors further interrupt reading. Practise accurate basic clauses first, then build longer sentences using controlled forms such as “because,” “which,” and “as a result.”
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.