Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Some individuals think that it is better to share all possible details in scientific research, business and the academic world.the main reason of that is equal development and helpful in breakthrough in related reasearch. While others think that some details are valuable to be shared publically such as information about nuclear energy. I believe that some information are too valuable for sharing to everyone due to its great consequences.

On the one hand, people say that information regarding science, business and the education should be shared to ensure equal development of the nations in world. The primary reason of that is inequalities in the development among various countries has cause major issue such as air pollution due to their dependency on fossil fuel for daily energy consumpation. For instance, many African countries are using coal powerplants for electricity generation due to lack of information regarding renewable energy technology. As a result, carbon emission is rapidly rising in the present time. From my prespective, informations regarding basic needs can be shared but it doesn't mean all information can be shared.

On the other hand, others say that some information are to dangerous to be shared openly to public such as nuclear energy. The nuclear energy is a clean source of energy but it has been used more for weapons and warfare due to its devastating impact. For example, The US military used nuclear bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the Japan during second world war. Consequently, many innocent lives were lost due to use of the nuclear bomb in war between two nations. If information of nuclkear energy falls in hand of militants that cab be detrimental to humanity. So, I believe that some information should be kept private due their greater drawbacks.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both views and state a clear position: basic information can be shared, while information with serious consequences should be restricted. The discussion of unequal access to renewable-energy knowledge and the example of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are relevant, and the latter supports your concern about dangerous applications. This meets the task well, but the two sides are not developed equally: the benefits of sharing are mainly explained through one broad example, while the risks receive more specific support. The claim about African countries relying on coal would be stronger with a more precise explanation or evidence. To strengthen the response further, explain more fully what kinds of scientific, business, or academic information should be shared and why, while distinguishing these from information that could be misused.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a concluding position within the final paragraph. Signposting such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “For instance” helps readers follow the argument. However, some connections are mechanical, and the progression within paragraphs is occasionally unclear. For example, the shift from unequal development to air pollution and then to coal use needs a more explicit link explaining how sharing research would address the problem. The final sentences repeat the position rather than drawing the discussion together. Use clearer referencing and vary transitions, ensuring each example is directly connected to the point it supports.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “renewable energy technology,” “fossil fuel,” “carbon emission,” and “devastating impact,” which helps communicate the subject matter. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “equal development” and “detrimental to humanity.” However, spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable and sometimes make the reader pause: “reasearch,” “consumpation,” “prespective,” and “nuclkear” are examples. Some combinations are also unnatural, including “shared publically” and “falls in hand of militants.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations and check spelling carefully. More precise terms for the types of information and the risks of sharing them would also make the argument clearer and less repetitive.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional and cause-and-effect structures: “If information … falls in hand of militants…” and “As a result, carbon emission is rapidly rising.” The main ideas are generally understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. These include subject–verb agreement (“some information are”), verb form (“has cause”), articles and prepositions (“in the Japan,” “due their greater drawbacks”), and sentence-boundary punctuation, such as the full stop followed by lowercase “the main reason.” The conditional sentence also needs a complete, correctly formed result clause. Review agreement with uncountable nouns such as “information,” article use with country names, and punctuation between sentences. Greater control of these patterns would make your varied sentence attempts more reliable.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.