Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-10
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
It is argued that to which extent amount of information related to reseearch on science, business and education should be disclosed. Some argue that maximum information should be accessible where some believe that there must be limitation on level of information vailability. I largely agree with second school of thought.
On the one hand side, It is thought that information to scientific research, business techniques and educational content must be available without any restriction and limitation as it is good for community. Considering positive use of such information, individuals or even institutes can have fruitful outcomes in their efforts. For instance, Availability of scientific research can assist institutes of same field in utilizing their resouces effectively considering given information without costly trails. Similarly, Business ideas with tools and techniques help entrepreneurs successeding in a long-run this will ultimately have positive impact on society. Likewise, Educational material and information can help number of students in their student life and make it easy for them to prepare for exams.
On the other hand, Some people argue that availabilty of every information may harm more then its positive impact. There are chances that people may start abusive use of scientific information available. For example, there may be irresponsible use of some chemicals that a person may try to use information given without understanding it and without safety measurements. Similarly, Too much information on business tools and techniques may become hazardous for some companies. As there may raise some cyber security concerns for some businesses that may result in more harm then benefit. Likewise, Information on academic world must be available to a person who need one, this should not be for all.
I largely agree with this view that there must be limited information in give field for people who do not need it. It should be available at some cost or require some hard work to find one so that it reaches to person who need it for good. Or businesses which successeded with hard work and struggle and researcher with worked of days and nights to become successful, information is valuable to them, it must not be available for everyone.
In conclusion, All Information related to science, academic and business should not be available easily. It is mainly due to chance of miss use
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
You address both perspectives and state a consistent preference for restricting access, particularly in the opening and the paragraph beginning “I largely agree with this view.” The examples about chemical misuse, business cybersecurity and educational materials are relevant, so the response covers the main parts of the task. However, some points are asserted rather than fully explained: the claim that business information may be “hazardous” is not clearly connected to a specific consequence, and the final position that information should be available “at some cost or require some hard work” needs a clearer principle for deciding what should be restricted. The conclusion also ends abruptly. To strengthen the response, develop the reasoning behind your limits and acknowledge when sharing information is beneficial or necessary.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, your opinion and a conclusion. This gives the reader a coherent overall route through the discussion, and examples generally follow the claims they support. Cohesion is less effective where linking phrases become repetitive: “Similarly” and “Likewise” recur, while “On the one hand side” is an awkward signpost. Some connections between ideas are also unclear, especially “As there may raise some cyber security concerns,” which does not smoothly explain the preceding claim. The final paragraph repeats your position but does not bring the discussion to a complete close. Use a wider range of natural transitions, make cause-and-effect links explicit, and ensure the conclusion synthesises both views.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use topic-related vocabulary such as “scientific research,” “entrepreneurs,” “cyber security” and “safety,” which helps communicate the subject. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, including “positive impact on society” and “valuable to them.” However, noticeable spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision, for example “reseearch,” “availabilty,” “resouces,” “trails” where “trials” is intended, and “miss use.” Several combinations are unnatural, including “fruitful outcomes in their efforts,” “business ideas with tools and techniques,” and “researcher with worked of days and nights.” These choices sometimes make the reader pause. Build accuracy by checking spelling and learning common collocations, especially for describing access, risk and the value of research.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including conditional and relative clauses, as in “There are chances that people may start…” and “a person who may try to use information…”. The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but control is inconsistent, and complex sentences often contain faulty construction. Examples include “It is argued that to which extent amount of information…,” “where some believe,” and “As there may raise some cyber security concerns,” where clause structure is incomplete or unclear. Agreement and sentence boundaries also need attention, as in “information … must be available to a person who need one” and the run-on “this will ultimately have positive impact.” Practise building complete clauses, checking subject–verb agreement and articles, and separating independent ideas with appropriate punctuation.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.