Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Many people believe that it is better to share all information regarding science, buisnesses, and academics; while others argue that some details are sensitive and valuable and should not be shared freely. While there are many concerns that raise with the security of information, I partially agree with both school of thoughts as information should be shared on the internet but with a proper preservation to its sensitive data. This essay will discuss both schools of thought, followed by my opinion in the end.

In the contemporary era, technology has widely spread all around the world by capturing the whole world. People are connected to each other through social media and all the information, whether it is research based, academia, or related to businesses; it has become a prevalence for the whole community. The access to such information help individuals in building their own businesses and its maintenance using experts' guidance as well as tricks. An interview of a powerful business mafia in Malaysia revealed that all the tricks shared by his business gurus on internet helped him develop his own skills and achieve a stable market position, which became beneficial for his own company.

The latter school of thought reveals the importance of such sensitive information that should not be revealed openly on the internet. No doubt, there are some information that have high security concerns and can not be shared to anyone. For instance, the scientific information related to building a nuclear weapon; although, these details can be beneficial for some countries in building a nuclear power as its defence, it can offer higher adverse effects. As it could also become an open threat to a World War if the access is given freely, leading to serious repurcussions.

Other than that, if high valuable information such as academic research's indepth details are shared openly on the internet to become accessible to everyone, it could also deteriorate the originality and recognition of the researcher especially if everyone starts having claims on their research. For instance, if a researcher finds out the solution to stabilizing power systems and makes the complete information available on the internet, he might not get the recognition and build its own identity universally.

Conclusively, I want to reiterate my opinion that although it is good to publicly share scientific, academic or business related information, not all information can be revealed freely. Considering the benefits of sharing information as well as its drawbacks, I believe that information should be shared on the internet but to a slight extent, while preserving its valuable in-depth information

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both views and give a clear, balanced position: information should be shared, but sensitive details should be protected. The examples about business advice and nuclear-weapons research are relevant and help explain the benefits and risks. However, some points are more fully developed than others. The business example is presented as an anecdote but its relevance to sharing research or business information could be explained more explicitly. The concern about researchers losing recognition is also asserted rather than explored—for example, you could explain how attribution or intellectual-property rules might address it. A more precise distinction between information that should be public and information that should be restricted would make your position and supporting ideas more fully developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall structure: an introduction, discussion of the benefits, two paragraphs on risks, and a conclusion. Paragraphs generally have clear central purposes, and signposts such as “The latter school of thought” help readers follow the shift in argument. However, some linking is mechanical or unclear. The opening sentence uses a semicolon before “while,” and “Other than that” does not clearly show how the researcher-recognition point relates to the previous security argument. The conclusion repeats the introduction’s position without drawing the strands together in a more specific way. Use transitions that express the exact relationship between ideas, and make references such as “these details” or “its” unambiguous.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “sensitive information,” “security concerns,” “recognition,” and “stable market position.” These choices allow you to discuss both the value of sharing and the risks of disclosure. You also attempt less common expressions, but some are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “a prevalence for the whole community,” “business mafia,” and “preservation to its sensitive data.” Spelling slips such as “buisnesses,” “repurcussions,” and “indepth” also reduce precision. Aim for natural collocations and check spelling carefully; for example, describe information as “widely accessible,” refer to a “business leader,” and say sensitive data should be “protected.” This would make your vocabulary more precise and fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including conditional clauses (“if everyone starts having claims”) and a concession (“although it is good to publicly share…”). Meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “The access to such information help” has a subject–verb agreement error, and “there are some information” uses an uncountable noun as plural. The opening sentence’s semicolon before “while” is also not well controlled, and the final sentence lacks a full stop. Review agreement, countable and uncountable nouns, and punctuation around clauses. More consistently accurate complex sentences would strengthen the control shown in your varied sentence forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.