Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In the open world, alot of people believes that sharing whole information in scientific research, business and the academic world is crutial while some believes that only limited important or valuable information should be delivered on the topics. In my perspective, sharing whole information and data would be more acurate thing to do any model.

First of all, every section of data demonstrates something about the topic and for it's practical approach and after having all the data and information we can extract the most valuable thing that makes the impact in our project. In this way, we can more accurately work on any project with the best possible resolution of it's success. For example, if I want to make a model of anything so I need to gather all information and make diagrams on it then I can finalize an reliable product from it. Therefore, it is essential to have every aspects of data and information to reach on the final stage.

In Contrast, some people believes that only some part of valuable information is enough to get on the resolution of the project, case study or any business idea. They only want to gather information which is most accurately matching with the final idea, model or project rather than spending more time on filter the information and data. In this way, they only focused on the most relevant information to finalize the data into a successfull model or any project.

In Conclusion, the most affective way to work on scientific research, business and the acadelic world is to work deliberaly with the all accessive information and data available and most of the people finds it most accuarate and effective way to reach on the resolution by testing each test and ended up get the best finalize product.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both views and state a preference for sharing all available information, so the response is relevant to the question. The first body paragraph explains that broad access can help researchers gather evidence and produce a more reliable outcome, while the second presents the opposing view as a way to save time by focusing on relevant material. However, the discussion is only partly developed: the case for protecting valuable information is not really explained in terms of confidentiality, commercial advantage, or potential harm, and the examples remain general rather than specific. Your position is also less clear in the conclusion, which refers to what “most of the people” find effective instead of directly reaffirming your own view. Develop both sides with concrete reasons and examples, then state your judgement consistently.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “First of all,” “In Contrast,” and “In Conclusion” help readers follow the intended structure. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes mechanical, and several ideas are repeated rather than extended—for example, the first body paragraph repeatedly links having all information with reaching a successful final product. Some connections are also unclear, particularly “for it's practical approach,” which makes the relationship between data and the project difficult to follow. Use linking phrases to show precise relationships, and make each sentence add a distinct reason, explanation, or example. Clearer referencing would also help the reader track what “this way” refers to.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “scientific research,” “valuable information,” “data,” and “relevant information,” and the meaning is generally recoverable. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate word choices or collocations make the writing less precise, such as “sharing whole information,” “get on the resolution,” and “finalize an reliable product.” Repetition of “information,” “data,” “project,” and “model” also restricts flexibility. There are noticeable spelling errors, including “crutial,” “acurate,” “successfull,” and “acadelic,” which reduce the overall accuracy of vocabulary use. Build a bank of natural phrases for discussing access, confidentiality, evidence, and outcomes, and check spelling and word forms during revision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentences, including clauses introduced by “while,” “if,” and “therefore,” but complex structures are often not controlled accurately. Agreement errors occur in “alot of people believes” and “some people believes,” while article and noun-form problems appear in “an reliable product” and “every aspects.” The opening sentence also has an unclear structure, and the final sentence combines several ideas in a way that makes its grammar difficult to follow. These recurring errors sometimes make the reader pause to interpret the intended meaning. Practise building accurate sentences around one main clause, then add subordinate clauses; check subject–verb agreement, articles, and singular/plural forms before combining ideas.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.