Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-15
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
In the current era , there is a burning debate on the issue about sharing information in the research, business and academic sector. While there is a common perception about sharing information freely, some people belive information should be confidential and should not come out for free. In my opinion, I strongly believe that information should be shared among the people all over the world without any restrictions for the betterment of the future. I also think free information sharing will bring nothing but good to any individuals.
Firstly, the current progress of the modern era is built on information sharing through communication. Without transfering knowledge among people, the modernization of the world would have came to a halt. Secondly, by sharing scientific research, people can open the window of new discoveries and technologies to tackle modern day problem. For instance, the patent of the vaccine for COVID was open for all so that vaccine manufacturers all over the world could use it to make medicines and save lives. In the business sector, open information about supply-demand, market trend and gap will help the entreprenuers to come forward and take part into the growth of local markets. Freely accesible academic information will help the student to improve their knowledge and overcome their lackings. A student from an underdeveloped country like Bangladesh can easily gain knowledge from an online library of the best institues of the world in the information is free to access. Free educational information will not help the student, but also will uplift the society by development through their knowledge.
However, the opposite perception of gate keeping information also has some logical grounds. Free information can be misused by certain people for the wrongdoings. For example, the scientific patent for nuclear and dangerous biological weapons should be restricted, othewise it can cause massive damage by the harmful people. Also, people can gather free scientific information and later claim it by their own.
Overall, information is one of the most valuable assets in the current world. Information can do wonder when they are used properly and in good intention. Thus, it should be available for the people all over the world at free of cost to take the current civilization into the next level, However, a regulatory check on the wrong use of information also should be imposed bcecause it is too valuable to be misused.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
You address both sides of the discussion and state a clear position: information should generally be shared, with safeguards against misuse. The supporting examples—global access to vaccine research, market information for entrepreneurs, and online academic resources—are relevant and help explain the benefits. The discussion of restrictions is also pertinent, particularly the risks involving nuclear or biological weapons. This meets the task well, while showing some of the stronger development expected at the next level. However, the opposing view is less fully explored: the point that people may claim others’ research as their own is mentioned but not explained, and the essay does not consider legitimate reasons such as commercial investment or privacy. Develop these counterarguments and qualify your broad claim that sharing brings “nothing but good.”
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph supporting open sharing, a paragraph presenting concerns, and a conclusion. Sequencing within the main supporting paragraph is generally understandable, and signposts such as “Firstly,” “Secondly,” and “However” make the direction of the argument clear. At times, though, cohesion feels mechanical because several points are linked mainly through these basic transitions. The long paragraph on benefits also moves quickly between science, business, and education, so grouping or separating these examples would make the progression easier to follow. Some references are unclear, as in “it can cause massive damage,” where the referent could be specified. Use more varied links and clearer references between claims and examples.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “scientific research,” “supply-demand,” “market trend,” “patent,” and “regulatory check.” These choices allow you to discuss several fields and communicate your position clearly. There are also attempts at less common expressions, such as “gate keeping information” and “uplift the society,” but some combinations are inaccurate or unnatural. Spelling errors—including “belive,” “transfering,” “entreprenuers,” and “accesible”—also reduce precision. Aim for more natural collocations and check word forms and spelling carefully. For example, “share information freely” is more idiomatic than “come out for free,” while “academic resources” is clearer than “academic information” when referring to materials students can access.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including a concession in “While there is a common perception…” and conditional phrasing in “Without transferring knowledge…” The main ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors occur in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction. For example, “would have came” should be “would have come,” and “information…they are used” has a singular/plural agreement problem. The sentence beginning “A student from an underdeveloped country…” also contains a faulty construction around “in the information is free to access.” Punctuation is sometimes inaccurate, particularly the comma splice before “However” in the conclusion. Review these patterns and aim for more consistently controlled complex sentences.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.