Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In contemporary society, some people believe that providing information on ragrding different kind of categories is beneficial whilst, other people think that if information is crucial or valuable then it might be shared freely. However, i think people have to right know everything about what they consume, in some case it might be helpful to keep out unnecessary information from public.

To commence with, people have to right know about business, scientific research and academic word. To elaborate it, when customer buy some product they first check the ingridiants of that products. This whole information not only provide data of that items but also helpful for their well-being. Because, people who are elergatic of some nutrisiants which helpful to advise them before they consume. For example, my neighbour always checked the information before he bought somethimg because he have some restrictions of cirtain food. consequentely, reaserch have to provide valuable information to local public which assist them to stay physicaly fit.

On the other hand, some false news might be distracted people from consume crucial information in that case only important information freely share. To explicate it, in technologicle era younger generation are influenced various advertisement and globle fashion trend. Although, it helpful to stay connect with word, it missued the trust of that perticular products. Which would be created problem for company reputation. Because of that people should right valuable and crucial information which are not harmful for their helth and assist to gain trust among products. Thus, providing real informtion is much more safer than unnecessry news.

In conclision, though people have to aware all kind of field information so according to that they can use product, false roumers might be distracted people and misslead them to believe in real news. i think providing life related information which could be helpful for local public is far more beneficial.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You attempt to discuss both views and give a personal position: you support public access to useful information, while acknowledging that some information may be withheld. The example about a neighbour checking food details is relevant and helps explain why consumers need information. However, the second view is not clearly developed. The discussion shifts to false news and advertising, rather than explaining why genuinely valuable or sensitive information—such as commercial secrets or unpublished research—might not be shared freely. Your position also becomes difficult to follow in places, especially in the opening and conclusion. Explain both sides directly, then state a consistent opinion and support it with a more specific example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting contrasting points, and a conclusion. Sequencing phrases such as “To commence with” and “On the other hand” signal the intended organisation. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear: the second body paragraph moves from false news to advertising, company reputation, and health without showing how these points answer the question about restricting valuable information. Several linking words are also awkwardly used, including “Because” at the start of a sentence and “Although” without a complete main clause. Make each paragraph follow one clear line of reasoning, and use simpler, more accurate links between claims and examples.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “scientific research,” “valuable information,” “advertisement,” and “company reputation,” and you attempt less common expressions such as “contemporary society.” However, the range is limited and several inaccurate word choices or collocations make meaning unclear. For example, “academic word” appears to mean “academic world,” while “false news might be distracted people” does not express the intended idea. Spelling errors such as “ingridiants,” “elergatic,” and “conclision” are frequent enough to affect readability. Build accuracy with common topic phrases first—for example, “share research findings,” “protect confidential information,” and “mislead consumers”—and proofread spelling and word forms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a conditional idea in “when customer buy some product” and a contrast introduced by “Although.” However, complex structures are often faulty, and frequent errors sometimes make relationships between ideas difficult to understand. Examples include “people have to right know,” “when customer buy,” and “people who are elergatic … which helpful,” where articles, agreement, and clause structure are not controlled. Sentence fragments also occur, such as “Because, people who…” and “Which would be created problem…”. Practise complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, and check articles, plural forms, and agreement. For instance: “Customers have the right to know what a product contains.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.