Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-19

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Many individuals believe that all the possible information should be disclosed to the research, business and academic world while others belive that senstive informations should not be shared.

Sharing information can be great for so many reasons for the better understanding of the concepts and to bring the transparency reagardless of the field. Hiding information can result into many negative outcomes such as misunderstanding, wrong descion making and many more. For instance talking about scientific field all the information shared can clear the assumptions and make it easy for individuals to grasp the complex concepts and see the real picture, for business all the crucial information should be disclosed making it clear and transparent for the consumers and dealers such as sources,procedure or quality details and as per acedmic world is concerned all the sallaybus source's and quality assesment procedures should be transparent to bring in the trust and confidence.

On the flip side, sharing too much of information can also lead to some potential issues which might include misuse of information or can creat chaos. When too much information is readily available in any field it can effect individuals and business. For example, if scientist shares any upcoming possible disaster which is not yet confirmed can cause chaos among people , if a business will share all the crucual details it can affect the busniness in so many ways like loosing the control over supplychain or too much outside involment into the policy making. Morover, sharing the acedmic records or valuable credintials openly can lead up to reveal of senstive personal information.

I firmly believe that not all of the information should be shared as it can have many negative outcomes like wrong decionmaking, misuse . While i also belive that all the possible information should be shared to bring transparency.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both perspectives and give a personal view, so the response is relevant to the full task. The first body paragraph explains benefits such as transparency and clearer understanding, while the second identifies risks including misuse, public panic, and exposure of personal information. However, the position is not fully clear: the conclusion says both that information should not all be shared and that all possible information should be shared. This leaves the reader unsure where you draw the line. Several examples are also asserted rather than explained, particularly the business risks and the reference to academic records. State a consistent position and develop one or two examples by explaining why particular information should be open or protected.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph for each view, and a concluding opinion. The contrast marker “On the flip side” helps signal the change in perspective, and examples generally follow the claims they illustrate. However, progression within the long first body paragraph is difficult to follow because scientific, business, and academic points are packed into one extended sentence. Some linking is mechanical, and the conclusion repeats both sides without resolving them. Use clearer topic sentences and divide the examples into shorter, logically connected sentences. More precise referencing would also help readers follow phrases such as “all the information” and “it,” whose intended referents are sometimes broad or unclear.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt vocabulary suited to the topic, including “transparency,” “misuse,” “sensitive personal information,” and “policy making.” These choices show some awareness of the subject’s range. However, the vocabulary is limited in precision, and several spelling and word-choice errors make the writing less fluent, such as “belive,” “senstive,” “descion,” and “credintials.” Some combinations are also unnatural: “result into” and “clear the assumptions” do not express the intended meanings idiomatically. Repeated broad terms such as “information,” “all,” and “many” reduce precision. Build a bank of accurate topic collocations, and proofread spelling and word forms before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “while,” “if,” and “which.” This gives the response some structural variety, but control is inconsistent, especially when several ideas are joined in one sentence. For example, the sentence beginning “For instance talking about scientific field” runs through three fields without clear sentence boundaries, and “if a business will share” uses an unsuitable verb form in the conditional. There are also errors in articles, agreement, and punctuation, as in “a business” followed by “it can effect” and the comma spacing around “people , if.” Aim for shorter, complete sentences and check conditional patterns, articles, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.