Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-19

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Some people believe that it is a good idea to share scientific-research data, acdemic data and information about business - to the world. Others are of the opinion that such information should bot not be freely accessible because of it relevance. Even though both believe might be valid , I strongly think sharing such information is better.

Information gotten from research on science, technology, business and academics - takes a lot of time, hardwork and effort by researcher to acquire. Some peole that all these information are precious and should not be freely given or made available to people who have not put in the hard work. They believe that if they really need if findings, - they should go and make research for themself, but in the hard work and do their own research. However this approach is not the best from developmental point of view.

Making academic and scientiifc findings freely available reduces the time and effort it would take to devlop on existing knowledge. For example if technologocal knowledge on electricity had been hiden, modern scientist would have to re-invent technologies that had already by developed. This would have slowed the devlopement of electrical gadget that we have in today's - Share such valuable information helps you know what already exists, and see where improvement could be made.

In summary, the benefits of sharing scientifc, academic and information relating to business - greatly outways hiding them. I strongly believe the world should freely have access to already existing information.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you favour sharing information, and you give a relevant reason that it can prevent repeated research and support development. The electricity example helps illustrate this point. However, the discussion of the opposing view is brief and partly unclear: you say researchers may feel information is “precious” because of the effort involved, but do not explain the practical reasons for restricting access, such as commercial advantage or confidentiality. Your own argument also needs fuller development, with a clearer explanation of who benefits and how. The response addresses the main topic, but the two views are not explored equally and some ideas remain under-supported.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction states your view, the body paragraphs present the two sides, and the conclusion restates your position. This makes the main line of argument reasonably easy to follow. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes disrupted by incomplete or unclear sentences, such as “Some peole that all these information are precious” and the fragment beginning “Share such valuable information.” The dash-heavy phrasing also interrupts connections between ideas. Use complete topic sentences and link each example explicitly to the claim it supports. More precise referencing would help readers follow what “they” and “this approach” refer to.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “scientific-research data,” “findings,” “re-invent technologies,” and “developmental point of view,” so the subject is generally identifiable. However, the range is limited and several spelling and word-choice errors make the writing less clear, including “acdemic,” “hiden,” “devlopement,” and “outways.” Some combinations are also unnatural, such as “information gotten from research” and “freely have access to.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations and check spelling carefully. Repeating “information” and “research” is understandable, but using precise alternatives such as “evidence,” “findings,” or “commercial data” would make the discussion more flexible.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including the concession in “Even though both believe might be valid” and the conditional example about what scientists would have to do if knowledge had been hidden. However, complex structures are often faulty, and errors sometimes make the intended meaning difficult to recover. For example, “Some peole that all these information are precious” lacks a complete clause, while “technologies that had already by developed” has an incorrect verb construction. There are also problems with articles, agreement, and sentence boundaries. Practise building complete clauses first, then check subject–verb agreement and verb forms in longer sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.