Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-20
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Due to sophisticated of technology, knowledge pay imperative role in everyones life. Here some people have belief that it is conducive to share information in scientific research, business and academic world, while other reckon that important information should be access freely to the world. However, this eassay shed light on both views along with my own point of view.
While taking first view into consideration, it can be said that it is beneficial to share as much as knowledge through various educational domains. Since masses know the basic behind a particular concept while indulge into specific field. According to the interest and field of particular person, piece of information provide to them during their academic as well as in workfield. As a result , they broaden their horizon in their course, which also aids the masses to pursue their carrier in the field, they are interested. For instance, a scientist has vast information about the fact , figure,thoeries and formulas. They gain this education during courses and intership. Thus, it is curcial to provide all the relavent data related to specific field to the masses in which they are involve.
However, the proponents of second view may think that the valuable information is shared freely. Masses should have some basic knowledge regarding very field like healthcare, scientific resarch, shareholders and manymore. Because this information help them in numerous circimstances. They can utilise this information while doing daily tasks. Despite fo their own field, thay can get access this information from social platform and online websites, where updates are upload by various authentic sites. For example, masses like to grab information about over-the-counter medication, which they can consume whenever there is need.
Finally to balance both views, it can be concluded that both views are based on strong ground and it is obvious aurdous to choose one, but i personally believe that former is worth following as information that is available for free, definately may cause some deterimental effects over the society. So, until the information is not verify by professionist , masses can neither understand the logic behind this nor utilise it in aprropriate way.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
You address both perspectives and state a preference for the first, concluding that information should be shared only when it has been verified by professionals. However, the discussion does not consistently match the question’s contrast: the second view is described as information being “shared freely,” but the paragraph mainly argues that people need basic knowledge and can find it online, rather than explaining why some information is too valuable or sensitive to release. The first view is also supported mostly by general claims about education and careers. Develop each side with a specific reason and example—for instance, how open research can accelerate medical progress, and how confidential business data or dangerous research findings may need protection. Make your position clearer and explain its implications.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs signalled by “While taking first view” and “However,” and a concluding paragraph. These markers help readers identify the two sides. However, progression within paragraphs is often difficult to follow because ideas are loosely connected or repeated. For example, the first body paragraph moves from basic knowledge to academic and workplace information, then to careers and a scientist’s training without clearly showing how each point supports the argument. The second paragraph similarly shifts from basic knowledge to online sources and medication. Use a clearer topic sentence, then develop one main reason with an explanation and example. Check linking phrases and references so that each sentence follows logically from the previous one.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You attempt topic-related vocabulary, including “scientific research,” “educational domains,” “broaden their horizon,” and “over-the-counter medication.” This shows some effort to use a range beyond basic words. However, the range is limited by frequent inaccurate word choice, spelling errors, and unnatural collocations that sometimes make meaning difficult to interpret. Examples include “knowledge pay imperative role,” “pursue their carrier,” and “information is not verify by professionist.” Several terms are also used imprecisely: “share freely” does not clearly convey the idea of information being too valuable or sensitive to disclose. Build a reliable set of topic-specific phrases and check spelling and word forms. Prefer precise expressions such as “protect confidential data” and “make research findings publicly available.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a subordinate clause beginning “Since” and a contrast introduced by “Despite.” However, complex structures are often faulty, and frequent errors in sentence construction and agreement can make the reader work to understand your meaning. For example, “Since masses know the basic behind a particular concept while indulge into specific field” is an incomplete and unclear sentence, while “piece of information provide to them” has an incorrect verb form. There are also problems with articles, plurals, and sentence boundaries, as in “a scientist has vast information about the fact, figure.” Practise building complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, and check agreement and articles. Read each sentence aloud to identify incomplete or overloaded constructions.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.