Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Some people argue that sharing lots of information in scientific research, business and academic world is preferred. Others believe some important information should remain confidential. This essay will discuss both sides before I agree with the first belief.

On one hand, keeping some information might save people's mental health. Often people are not mentally ready for shocking news. Information that can drastically change the whole view and perspective how we percieve things can have a negative effect. Especially if an information is important but just a theory without any proof and evidence unecessary chaos can take place in society. For instance, when a national bank makes a public statement assuming rise in interest rates, interest rates rise, only because the people get nervous and make some decisions that actually lead to the increase.

On the other hand, the shared information can lead to important discoveries. Often scientists or intellectual society read the papers to futher develop their existing ideas and complete a bigger picture. Without sharing important information, it remains confidential and invisible, therefore less useful for the humanity. For example, if Einstein thought his ideas were too valuable to be kept secret, we would not be on this stage of development. Furthermore, from the socio-ethical view scientists and researchers work for the society, which means everyone has the right to be aware of the current situation in the world. The npositive sides of

In conclusion, I do believe sharing information can bring more advantages, than disadvantages therefore there is not a meaningful reason to keep the valuable information secret from society.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both views and state a clear preference for sharing information, so the response is relevant to the task. The argument for sharing is supported with the idea that researchers can build on one another’s work, and the Einstein example helps illustrate this. However, the opposing view is framed mainly around protecting people from distress and market reactions, rather than explaining why information may be too valuable or commercially sensitive to share. The bank example is relevant but its cause-and-effect explanation is not fully clear. The point about everyone’s right to know is also asserted rather than developed. To strengthen the response, explain the benefits and risks more precisely and support each with a specific, well-explained example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting contrasting views, and a conclusion. The signposts “On one hand” and “On the other hand” make the main contrast easy to follow, and the final sentence restates your position. However, progression within the paragraphs is uneven: the first paragraph moves from mental health to unproven theories and then to interest rates without clearly connecting these points. The second body paragraph ends with the incomplete fragment “The npositive sides of,” which interrupts the argument and makes the paragraph feel unfinished. Use clearer links between each claim and its example, and check that every paragraph ends with a complete, relevant thought.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “confidential,” “discoveries,” “develop their existing ideas,” and “socio-ethical.” These choices help communicate the main arguments, and the meaning is generally understandable. There are, however, several spelling errors, such as “percieve,” “unecessary,” and “futher,” as well as some imprecise or unnatural phrasing. For example, “on this stage of development” does not express the intended idea naturally, and “the shared information” is less idiomatic than a general reference to sharing information. Aim for more precise collocations and proofread spelling; this will make the argument sound more controlled and academic.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including the conditional example “if Einstein thought his ideas were too valuable … we would not be…” and a relative clause beginning “which means.” Most of the central meaning remains clear, but some grammatical errors and incomplete construction reduce accuracy. For instance, “the npositive sides of” is an unfinished fragment, while “the whole view and perspective how we percieve things” lacks a grammatical link before “how.” There are also issues with articles and sentence construction in “in scientific research, business and academic world” and “if an information is important.” Work on completing sentences, using articles appropriately, and checking clause connections while retaining your attempts at complex forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.