Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Undeniably, science has made a remarkable progress in each and every field. Considering this, a section of humankind argue that it is good to deliver as much as information as feasible in scientific experiment, business and academic world, while other claim that some information are quite productive and crucial to be shared openly. This essay will not only discuss both the view but the reasons for my inclination is articulated while concluding this.

There are compelling reasons to justify why information ought to be share as much as possible in many sector. To begin with, providing a data in amples of sector has positive impact as it helps to reduce concern over complex issues. To elaborate, after gathering information , many singletons can share the details by different platform which is fruitful for personal growth in different stream. As a result, people might not be lack during problem solving situation and simplfy the problem. Another crux is that, bussines innovation, companies can exchange ideas and cultivate better products. Because of ideas, people can earn handsome amount of remuneration by selling fresh product in market.To cite an example, in 2006 , italian employer opened their own one plus company after collecting the infomation from apple organization in America.

Furthermore, there are numerous reasons for not sharing the ideas to other people freely. Th first and foremost reasons is that, in terms of business, other companies might copy the same concepts in their own company, Because of that company could suffer financial losses and generate lowest revenue. As a result, the graph remain consistence instead of growth which highly impacts in workers salary. Secondly, protecting intellectual property is mandatory as inventors invest time and money in developing new products. Consequently, others might copy their inventions and likely to produce different items but same procedure.To illustarte, in Kuwait, the process of producing steel were copied by IMCO industries with same stages in the year 2009.

To recapitulate, even though sharing is caring in every sectors as it reduce the scientific concern and bussiness innovation can be easy for producing the new product , i firmly believe that individuals should not share the information to others as other company may copy right the similar concept and invention ideas can protect in our own dictionary.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both positions and give a clear final preference against sharing information freely, so the main parts of the prompt are present. The paragraph on openness offers reasons such as reducing difficulties in problem-solving and enabling business innovation; the paragraph on restriction explains the risk of copying and the value of protecting intellectual property. However, the position is not consistently clear: the introduction says your reasons for an “inclination” will be given without stating it, and the conclusion’s claim that information should not be shared sits uneasily with the earlier benefits. Several examples, including the OnePlus and steel-production cases, are difficult to verify or explain and do not clearly demonstrate the point. Develop each reason with a clearer explanation and make your opinion consistent throughout.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. This makes the discussion easy to follow, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “Furthermore,” and “To recapitulate” help indicate the stages of the argument. The ideas generally progress within each paragraph, particularly from the risk of copying to possible financial losses. However, some links are mechanical or unclear. For example, “Because of ideas” does not clearly connect the preceding claim to its result, and “To cite an example” introduces an example whose relevance is not explained. The conclusion also shifts to a firm opposition to sharing without reconciling this with the benefits discussed. Clarify references and use transitions to show the precise relationship between claims and examples.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “intellectual property,” “financial losses,” “innovation,” and “remuneration,” which helps address the subject. There are also efforts to use less common expressions such as “compelling reasons” and “crux.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or unnatural, sometimes making the intended meaning difficult to follow: “a data in amples of sector,” “reduce concern over complex issues,” and “the graph remain consistence” are examples. Spelling errors such as “bussines,” “infomation,” and “illustarte” further reduce control. Aim for precise, natural combinations rather than ornate phrasing, and check spelling and word forms carefully. For instance, use “share information across sectors” and “protect intellectual property.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional idea (“other companies might copy”) and a result clause (“As a result…”). However, control is uneven, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to process. Examples include “other claim that some information are,” where subject–verb agreement and countability are problematic, and “the graph remain consistence,” which has agreement and sentence-form errors. Articles and plurals are also unreliable, as in “providing a data” and “in many sector.” Punctuation is sometimes misplaced, particularly around commas and sentence boundaries. Practise building accurate basic clauses first, then add subordinate clauses; check agreement, articles, and singular/plural forms in each sentence.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.