Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Informations has several impact on socities it depends on its important wheateher it sholud be public or not.Some people argue it is a right way to provide information related to scientific research ,business or academic world.while other argue that some information are too importnat or too valuable too be shared publicaly.In my view if it related to awareness of some issues its a right of public to know about it .

There are different types of informations that we have been consuming it for years.However it has created good and bad impact on socities,Academic world information can give you more knowledge to learn through the researches or business information can help you to manage own business while studying analysis of businessmen. scientific research may create issue for people after publically release. take for example few years ago world faced the coronavirus that had took many people lives after spreading this news many died with only flow or cough and stayed in isolation untill they recovered.

Valuable informations may cause alot issues for county if it being shared secretly. there are many people wants to drag it out for there personal benfits.Although it can damage the whole country economically or its soverienty .

In conclusion i would say that if it related to academic or business its should be increase for people to find lope holes in there businesses.Scientific informations need to belong only scientiests,because it contain too importants document for country developments.There should a proper rules law for the research center to know about pros and cons either it should be release or not.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address both sides of the debate and give a personal view: you support public access when information raises awareness, while arguing that scientific material may need protection. However, the position is not consistently clear, because the conclusion introduces a distinction between academic/business information and scientific information without explaining why these categories should be treated differently. The discussion is also limited and under-developed. For example, the coronavirus example is difficult to follow and does not clearly show how sharing research caused the harm described. Develop each side with a relevant, clearly explained example, and state a consistent position on what should be shared, with whom, and under what conditions.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic paragraph structure, moving from an introduction to discussion and a conclusion, and expressions such as “However,” “Although,” and “In conclusion” show an attempt to connect ideas. Nevertheless, the overall progression is unclear: the second paragraph combines benefits of academic and business information with a confusing example about coronavirus, while the next paragraph shifts abruptly to national security. Some links are also difficult to follow, such as “Valuable informations may cause alot issues for county if it being shared secretly.” Organise the body into one paragraph for each viewpoint, use topic sentences to signal the focus, and make pronouns and references explicit so readers can follow how each example supports the argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “scientific research,” “academic world,” “economically,” and “sovereignty,” which helps identify the subject. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate word choices or spellings make parts difficult to understand. Examples include “informations,” “publicaly,” “lope holes,” and “drag it out”; these do not express the intended ideas clearly or naturally. There are also awkward combinations such as “too importants document” and “business information can help you to manage own business.” Build a more precise set of phrases for discussing access, confidentiality, research findings, and commercial advantage, and check spelling and word forms. This would make your meaning clearer and reduce repetition of “information.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a conditional idea (“if it related to awareness…”) and a contrast introduced by “Although.” However, the range is limited, and errors in sentence structure, agreement, articles, and verb forms occur frequently enough to make some sentences hard to interpret. For instance, “some information are too important” has an agreement problem, while “if it being shared” lacks a correctly formed verb phrase. The long sentence beginning “Academic world information can give you…” also joins several ideas without clear punctuation or structure. Practise building accurate subject–verb patterns and complete clauses first, then combine them with conjunctions. Check sentence boundaries and punctuation during revision.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.