Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In the contemporary society there is an argument surrounding the issue that few individuals are of the view that it is better to deliver as much information as possible in scientific reserach, business and the academic world, in contrast remaining believes that a little information is crucial to be shared freely. I agree with the former because when we have more information we can easily examine the pros and cons of the things.

On the one hand, transferring a more information plays a substantial role because it helps people to analyse the things deeply. Moreover, when people recieve extra knowledge about the things they can easily understand the process that how to manage. For instance, a doctor who has to operate the eye of the patient he needs to have much more knowledge about this that will help him in any difficult as situation as all the conditions are different. Therefore, people with great knowledge are more admirable and help others in a great way.

On the other hand, a small piece of information is helpful for the people as they don't want to stuff their mind with the irrelevant things that made them bamboozled. Sometimes small understanding cause a bigger difference to analyze the things properly. For example, a student who is weak in mathematics and does not know how to solve the questions he just need to have special formulas for the specific questions that not fill their mind.Only relevant information helps to solve tasks quickly.

In conclusion, I believe that having surplus amount of knowledge about the things helps to get the total understanding, also encourage us to know about the advantages and disadvantages.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You present a clear preference for sharing information, and both sides are included in separate body paragraphs. The examples of a doctor needing knowledge and a student benefiting from focused information are relevant, but they do not fully address the central issue of whether valuable information should be shared freely. In particular, the opposing view is reframed as avoiding irrelevant information, rather than protecting important or commercially sensitive knowledge. Your reasons are also quite general, and the conclusion repeats your preference without resolving this tension. To strengthen the response, explain specific benefits and risks of open sharing—for example, faster scientific progress versus privacy, security, or intellectual-property concerns—and develop your own position in relation to both sides.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two contrasting body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The signposts “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” make the intended progression easy to follow. However, some connections are mechanical, and the ideas within paragraphs do not always build clearly. For example, the doctor example leads to the broad claim that knowledgeable people are “more admirable,” which is not fully explained. The second paragraph shifts from protecting valuable information to avoiding irrelevant information, so the contrast is not consistently maintained. Improve cohesion by using clearer links between each claim and its example, and by referring directly to the task’s issue of sharing information freely.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some vocabulary suited to an academic discussion, including “pros and cons,” “substantial role,” “analyse,” and “relevant information.” This gives you enough range to communicate the main ideas, but several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unclear, which sometimes makes the reader work to understand your meaning. Examples include “transferring a more information,” “remaining believes,” and “a small piece of information is helpful” where the intended meaning appears to be selective or protected information. There are also spelling errors such as “reserach” and “recieve.” Aim for precise topic vocabulary and check common word partnerships; for instance, distinguish “sharing research findings” from “protecting confidential information.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “because,” “when,” and “who.” However, complex sentences are often faulty, and errors in articles, agreement, sentence construction, and punctuation occur frequently enough to affect clarity. For example, “when people recieve extra knowledge … they can easily understand the process that how to manage” has an unclear clause structure, while “Sometimes small understanding cause a bigger difference” has agreement and article problems. The opening sentence is also difficult to follow because several ideas are joined without clear grammatical control. Practise building shorter, accurate sentences first, then add subordinate clauses; check subject–verb agreement, articles, and punctuation when editing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.