Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

There is ongoing debate about whether it is positive thing to share knowledge related to science, business and academia with everyone or whether it is better to keep some stuff confidential. This essay will examine both views before giving my own opinion.

As we know that all the knowledge we have today is the result of multiple people and generations of scientists working together, sharing valuable stuff they discovered and businesses investing in these researches and then academic professional passing this knowledge to upcoming generations. I believe without putting all this information out there, all this progress of worlds wasn't possible. For example when one scientist do some research and upload it on some platform to be accessible for other scientist's to take his work as a lead for future experimentation and research. This saves new scientists from performing same stuff and make it possible for them to achieve their required results much faster.

Conversely, there is kind of knowledge which isn't supposed to be accessible to general public. Some scientific procedures are too detrimental for common people to be aware of. For example, in some countries lab attendants start labeling themselves as doctors with limited amount of medicine knowledge and start running their own businesses as doctors. This practice lead to illegal and unethical behavior and violation of SOPs.

In conclusion, even though availability of vast range of knowledge is beneficial for world progress, I believe some information is supposed to stay between particular circles and shouldn't be available to everyone as it can have catastrophic effects on society.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the discussion and state a clear position: sharing knowledge supports progress, but some information should remain restricted because it may harm society. The example of researchers building on published work is relevant and explains a practical benefit. However, the opposing view is less fully developed: the example about lab attendants presenting themselves as doctors illustrates misuse of knowledge, but the link to information being too valuable or important to share is not made explicit. The discussion also focuses mainly on science, with business and academic knowledge receiving little separate consideration. To strengthen the response, explain more directly what kinds of information might need protection and why, and develop the examples so they support each part of the question.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph supporting open sharing, a contrasting paragraph, and a conclusion that restates your view. Transitions such as “Conversely” and “In conclusion” help signal the direction of the argument, and the ideas generally progress logically. This is a solid organisational foundation. Some links within paragraphs are less smooth, however: the long opening sentence of the second paragraph combines several stages of knowledge-sharing, making the relationships between them harder to follow. The example in the opposing paragraph also moves quickly from restricted procedures to people claiming to be doctors. Use shorter, more clearly connected sentences and explain the link between each example and its main point to make cohesion more flexible and precise.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “confidential,” “experimentation,” “ethical behavior,” and “catastrophic effects.” These choices show an attempt to discuss both the benefits and risks of sharing information. However, the range is uneven, and several informal or imprecise expressions reduce the academic tone: “some stuff,” “putting all this information out there,” and “same stuff.” There are also awkward combinations such as “academic professional passing this knowledge” and “a vast range of knowledge.” Aim for more precise, natural collocations and avoid repeating broad words such as “stuff” and “knowledge.” This would make your argument clearer and more appropriately formal while retaining the relevant vocabulary you already use.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mixture of sentence forms, including a complex opening sentence and clauses introduced by “whether,” “without,” and “even though.” The overall meaning is usually understandable, but some errors in agreement, articles, and verb forms remain. For example, “it is positive thing” needs an article, “one scientist do” should have subject–verb agreement, and “This practice lead” needs a past or present-tense verb that agrees with its subject. The sentence beginning “As we know that” is also structurally awkward, while the long sentence about scientists, businesses, and academic professionals is difficult to control. Practise checking articles and verb endings, and divide long sentences where necessary so your complex structures remain accurate.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.