Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In recent times, many people are of the opinion that it's worthwhile to pass the information in the fields of scientific research, business, and educational sectors. However, others argue that some of the information is crucial and valuable to be discussed freely. In my opinion, both statements have some valid points, but I partly agree with the former one because sharing information will be beneficial for society in many areas of life, such as in academia and businesses.

On the one hand, with the technological advancements, everyone has access to almost any information they want. Many people share much news, whether it's important or unimportant, all over the world. Forwarding this kind of information can be helpful for many communities, including scientific research departments, businesses, and the academic world, because they are already researching in those areas, and any useful information can help them in publishing their work, which can achieve prominence in the whole world. For example, mathematicians sometimes solve their problems by studying intuitions of many individuals. Similarly, any advice can become useful in businesses to grow, and many students can make inventions by making projects by studying their teacher's interests.

On the other hand, some information is too critical to be discussed with certain individuals, as it may harm them in personal and professional areas of life. Although the information can help explore different areas of research, many people copy others' works by stealing their ideas and then labeling them by their name. For instance, in many companies, employees are frustrated because their bosses take credit for their efforts. This has some negative consequences on a person's life. Therefore, some vital information should be kept secretly and not be disclosed to anyone freely.

In conclusion, although discussing crucial information freely can be harmful sometimes, I believe passing useful information with each other can be helpful to society in research and businesses to succeed.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You discuss both views and state a position: you partly support sharing information because it can benefit society, while recognising risks such as idea theft. The examples about research, businesses and employees taking credit are relevant. However, the first view is developed more clearly than the opposing view, and some support is vague: the point about mathematicians studying “intuitions” and students making inventions by studying teachers’ interests does not clearly show how open information-sharing helps. Your conclusion restates your position but does not sharpen the conditions under which information should be shared. Explain more precisely what should remain protected, such as confidential business data or unpublished research, and why this balances the two views.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for each view, and a conclusion. The progression from the benefits of sharing to the risks is easy to follow, and signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” make the organisation clear. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent arrangement and shows some of the flexibility associated with stronger cohesion. However, links within paragraphs are sometimes mechanical, and references such as “this kind of information” and “they” are not always precise. The first body paragraph also moves quickly between research, business and education without developing a clear sequence. Use more explicit links between each claim and its example, and make pronoun references unmistakable.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “technological advancements,” “prominence,” “critical,” and “consequences,” and the main ideas remain understandable. There are also attempts at less common phrasing, but several choices are inaccurate or unnatural, which limits precision: “pass the information,” “discussed freely,” “studying intuitions,” and “kept secretly” do not express the intended meanings naturally. Some repetition of “information,” “helpful,” and “useful” also makes the vocabulary less flexible. Aim for accurate collocations and more specific terms, such as “share information,” “make information publicly available,” and “protect confidential material.” This would make your argument clearer without requiring more complicated vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including subordinate clauses such as “because sharing information will be beneficial” and “as it may harm them.” Most sentences communicate their meaning, and punctuation generally supports the paragraph structure. Some grammatical errors remain, however. In “the information is crucial and valuable to be discussed,” the infinitive construction is not well formed; “valuable enough to share” would be clearer. “Many people share much news” also has an awkward quantifier pattern, while “by making projects by studying” repeats the same grammatical structure and obscures the relationship between the actions. Review article and preposition patterns, and simplify sentences when several ideas are joined. More consistently controlled complex sentences would improve accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.