Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-25

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The world is growing rapidly, technological advancements has enable people to research about things that were once not known like space and ocean etc. Some people believe that research should contain as much information as possible, while others believe that some information is very important or valuable to be shared freely.

On one hand, research should be detailed and should share all the required information possible so that countries or organization that are struggling with a specific thing could take notes from the information. For example, a scientific research on a vaccine of a deadly virus should include all the possible measures, ingredients and precautions required for the production of the vaccine, so that countries that are affected from the virus can benefit from it. If a business or academic stories are sucessfull, it should include all the case studies and formulas that are used, so people can inspire and be sucessfull at their niche.

On other hand, research should also have controlled boundaries. Some researches needs to be limited in information so that it is relevant for people. For example, scientific research on nuclear weapons, it should not include the formulas, ingredients or process for the nuclear weapons. It should only include relevant information. Case studies on murders or robberies should not include the detail description as it could spark an idea in other peoples mind.

In conclusion, detail information should be there, where it is required for the people and where it is beneficial for the whole world, for example in business studies, academic development or research on vaccines etc. Passing of valuable or important information should be looked at closely as it can reveal secrets that should not come out, example creating deadly weapons, case studies murders or robberies etc.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both views and give a clear overall position: information should be shared when it benefits people, but sensitive material needs limits. The vaccine example supports open research, while nuclear weapons and crime-related case studies illustrate risks, so the response remains relevant to the question. The discussion is not equally developed, however. The first view is explained through practical benefits, whereas the second relies mainly on examples and would be stronger with a fuller explanation of who should decide what is too sensitive and why. Your opinion is clearest in the conclusion; stating it more explicitly in the introduction and developing the implications of each view would make the argument more complete and sustained.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two positions, and a conclusion. The contrastive signposts “On one hand” and “On other hand” help readers follow the discussion, and examples are generally placed alongside the relevant claims. Some connections are mechanical or unclear, though. “On other hand” needs an article, and the final paragraph repeats examples rather than drawing the two arguments together. Within the second body paragraph, the shift from nuclear weapons to crime case studies is understandable but could be linked more explicitly through the shared concern about misuse. Use clearer referencing and varied transitions, and make the conclusion synthesise the reasoning rather than restating it.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “technological advancements,” “ingredients,” “precautions,” “nuclear weapons,” and “case studies,” which allows you to discuss both scientific and social risks. However, the range and precision are uneven, with several noticeable word-choice, collocation, and spelling problems. Phrases such as “academic stories,” “take notes from the information,” and “spark an idea in other peoples mind” are not natural or precise in this context; “academic studies,” “learn from the findings,” and “give others ideas” would be clearer. “Sucessfull” is also misspelled, and “research” is repeated frequently. Aim for accurate topic-specific collocations and check spelling, while retaining the useful vocabulary you already use.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including purpose clauses such as “so that countries ... can benefit from it” and conditional reasoning about what research should include. Meaning is generally understandable, but some errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction remain. For example, “technological advancements has enable” should be “technological advancements have enabled,” and “Some researches needs” should be “Some research needs.” The opening phrase “research about things” also needs a more natural grammatical construction, such as “research topics that were once unknown.” In the final paragraph, the sentence beginning “Passing of valuable or important information” is awkwardly formed. Review subject–verb agreement and practise building accurate complex sentences before adding more structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.