Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-26

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The topic is about, Whether it is good to share information in scientific research, business and the academic information freely or closely confidential. In my opinion, both the views has equal advantages and disadvantages.

In one hand, Information about scientific research, business and academic knowledge should be available in order to make the lives of people safe and easy. For example; during COVID-19, most of the information about the early prevention of disease was shared openly in the public due to which many lives are saved. The detailed information to cancel the positive COVID virus was released in public in order to build the trust of people that it is possible to handle the situation of a huge disease.

In other hand, some information are very confidential to share causing big crime and terroristial war leading to the distruction. If the information got leaked in any way, it might cause various disasters. For example, if the information about making a neuclear weapon got into a bad hands, they might use the imformation to cause trouble and crime.

In conclusion, the both views are true and cannot be debated. If the information is not shared, people will have least information about the situation they are facing and if the information got into a bad hand it might cause various terroristial crimes and even wars.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You discuss both sides and give a general view that each has advantages and disadvantages. The examples about public COVID-19 guidance and information on nuclear weapons are relevant, and they show why sharing can help while unrestricted access may be dangerous. However, the position is not fully clear: saying the views have “equal advantages and disadvantages” and later that they “cannot be debated” does not explain what you personally believe or when information should be shared. The ideas are also brief, especially the point about business and academic information, which receives little specific development. The response is 27 words below the required minimum, so there is limited space to explain and support your arguments. Develop your opinion and add a specific example or explanation for each side.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. This makes the main contrast easy to identify, and phrases such as “For example” help introduce supporting details. However, progression within the paragraphs is limited, and the conclusion mostly repeats the two risks rather than bringing the discussion to a clear judgement. Some linking expressions are inaccurate or repetitive, including “In one hand” and “In other hand”; use “On the one hand” and “On the other hand.” The opening sentence is also awkwardly punctuated, which interrupts the flow. Build each body paragraph around a clear claim, explain its consequence, and connect the example explicitly to that claim.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “scientific research,” “confidential,” “leaked,” and “nuclear weapon,” so the reader can follow the central subject. There are also attempts to express consequences, such as “various disasters” and “cause trouble.” However, the range is limited and several choices or spellings are inaccurate, sometimes making meaning less precise: “terroristial,” “distruction,” “neuclear,” and “imformation.” Phrases such as “cancel the positive COVID virus” do not communicate the intended idea naturally. Aim for precise collocations and check spelling carefully; for example, describe “preventing infection” or “controlling the spread of the virus.” More varied language for benefits, risks, and safeguards would help you explain the topic with greater precision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a conditional example beginning “If the information got leaked,” and a reason clause with “due to which.” However, errors are frequent and sometimes make the relationships between ideas difficult to follow. Examples include “both the views has,” “some information are,” and “many lives are saved,” where agreement or tense is not controlled. Articles and sentence construction also need attention: “got into a bad hands” and “The topic is about, Whether…” are not grammatically formed. The conditional sentence about leaked information would be clearer as “If information were leaked, it might cause serious harm.” Practise subject–verb agreement, articles, and consistent past tense when describing the COVID example, while keeping sentence structures manageable.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.