Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-29
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Few individuals believe that it is better to share more infromation in scientific research, business and the academic world while, others argue that some information is too crucial to be shared freely. This essay will discuss both the arguments after that give a relevant opinoin.
On the one hand, gathering too much information and shared them with any field is some times hectic task because we collected lot of data and it is create confusion between right and wrong side for any kinds of filed related to scientific research, business, and the academic world. Furthermore, all three field need as much informtaion to gathering where, scientific research need more data to done any kind of research also besiness runs on the data analytical report where they recquired previous data to search and creates better and more sales of products to the coustomer. For example, weather reports recqired more data from the satellite to give facts and creates weather report for the general public.
On the other hand, surveys are the traditional method of collecting the information. For instance when the field survey is going ahead surveyor ask some relevant questions according to the questioners and informer give these answer, not too much information and it create a genuine field survey also create well-managed report. On top of it, lab research ,industries and any academic world need valuable data and these type of information help to implemented any policies.
I am of opine that too valuable infromation is much better than the too much information because it creates confusion and sometimes not easy to store.
To recapitulate, after scrutinizing the topic in its entirety it can be manifested that much infromation creates confuson, hard to forward to the main point, whilst, vital or valuable data creates facts and help to generate typical policies.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
You address the topic by presenting reasons for sharing information and for restricting access, then state a preference for valuable information over excessive information. However, the discussion only partially answers the central contrast: the first body paragraph focuses on the difficulty of handling too much data, rather than explaining why information should be shared widely, while the second relies mainly on surveys and policy-making without clearly explaining why valuable information should be protected. Your opinion is present, but “too valuable information is much better” is unclear and is not supported with a specific example. Develop each side directly—for example, discuss collaboration and public benefit versus commercial confidentiality or sensitive research—and explain how your own view follows from those reasons. The response meets the stated length requirement; eight words copied from the prompt were excluded from the count.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The response has a recognisable essay structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs representing opposing views, a personal opinion, and a conclusion. Paragraphing helps the reader identify these sections, and signposts such as “On the one hand” and “On the other hand” indicate contrast. However, progression within paragraphs is often difficult to follow because ideas are loosely connected or do not clearly support the paragraph’s main point. For example, the discussion moves from data causing confusion to weather reports without explaining how this supports sharing information. Linking phrases such as “Furthermore” and “On top of it” are used, but they cannot replace clear logical connections. Give each paragraph one focused claim, then explain and illustrate it in a deliberate sequence; use references and transitions only where their relationship is clear.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “scientific research,” “data analytical report,” “field survey,” and “valuable data.” This shows some awareness of the subject-specific language needed. However, the range is limited and several noticeable spelling, word-form, and collocation errors make parts of the response difficult to interpret, such as “infromation,” “besiness,” “coustomer,” and “too valuable information.” Some phrases are also imprecise, including “right and wrong side” and “typical policies.” Aim for accurate, natural combinations rather than adding complex-sounding wording: for instance, describe data as “reliable” or “relevant,” and explain whether information is “confidential” or “commercially sensitive.” Proofreading spelling and checking common collocations would make your meaning clearer.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You use both simple statements and attempts at longer, more complex sentences, including a sentence beginning “because” and one using “where.” However, the longer structures are often faulty, and frequent errors in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction can make the meaning hard to follow. For example, “gathering too much information and shared them” does not maintain a consistent grammatical form, and “it is create confusion” has an incorrect verb structure. In “all three field need,” the subject and noun form do not agree. Work first on building accurate simple sentences, then combine them with controlled clauses using “because,” “although,” or “which.” Check that each sentence has a clear subject and correctly formed verb, and review punctuation around introductory phrases.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.