Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In many nations, the debate on academic research has been going on since past years. Some people argues that it is good to disseminate more information in the academic society or scientific research, while other thinks some data is too significant and crucial to be shared openly. In this essay, I will discuss both opinions and discuss my viewpoint along with conclusion.

Sharing information freely is beneficial for some people's. Students and researchers can easily read data from an existing research for their thesis without paying a single penny and they will get to know on which topic research is already done and where is the gap . For instance, people who cannot afford high subscription fees for paid articles, usually ends up taking lower quality data, which impacts their research negatively. Hence, sharing information in the academic world have positive impact on future research and innovation.

On the other hand, it is believe that sharing a vital information openly is detrimental. Some people misuse's or alter the data for their own benefits and to harm others. For example, they publish others work without their consent to gain an academic validation. Consequently, it raise questions toward credibility of scientific research. Another reason is, some information is too sensitive to be shared publicly, like how to make the certain drugs or harmful weapons etc. As a result, it will impact whole society negatively.

In conclusions, whether to share information in academic world freely or not have its negative sides as well positive sides. I will prefer a more balance approach toward scientific research with systematic approach.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses both sides of the discussion and gives a personal view: open access is linked to research opportunities, while unrestricted sharing is associated with misuse and sensitive information. These are relevant points, and the examples about subscription fees and harmful weapons help illustrate them. However, the two positions are not developed equally fully. The benefits paragraph explains how access can help students identify research gaps, but the final opinion—“a more balance approach”—is only briefly stated and not explained. Clarify what that balance would involve, such as making ordinary research accessible while restricting genuinely dangerous or confidential material. This would make the position more definite and the supporting reasoning more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. The progression from access to potential harms is easy to follow, and linking expressions such as “For instance,” “Hence,” and “On the other hand” help signal relationships between ideas. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some flexibility in connecting examples to claims. At times, however, the links feel formulaic, and the conclusion repeats the two-sided framing rather than drawing the discussion together. The opening also promises to discuss the viewpoint “along with conclusion,” which is not a natural signpost. Use transitions more selectively and make the final paragraph synthesise the arguments and explain the proposed balance.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

There is an adequate range for the topic, including relevant terms such as “disseminate,” “subscription fees,” “credibility,” and “sensitive.” These choices show an attempt to use more precise and less common vocabulary, and the meaning is generally clear. Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, however: “academic society,” “academic validation,” and “impact whole society negatively” do not express the intended ideas naturally. There are also form errors such as “a vital information” and “some people's.” Aim for accurate combinations and forms rather than adding complexity: for example, use “academic community,” “academic recognition,” and “harm society as a whole.” This would make the argument sound more precise and fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response uses both simple and complex forms, including a relative clause in “people who cannot afford high subscription fees” and a conditional-style explanation of consequences. Most sentences remain understandable, but some errors in agreement, articles, and verb forms reduce accuracy. Examples include “Some people argues,” “other thinks,” “sharing information … have,” and “it is believe”; these should be “argue,” “others think,” “has,” and “it is believed.” Article use also needs attention in “a vital information” and “the certain drugs.” The conclusion contains a further agreement error in “whether … freely or not have.” Check each sentence’s subject and verb, and review countable versus uncountable nouns. More consistently accurate complex sentences would strengthen control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.