Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The sharing of information plays an important role in the development of science, business and education. While some people believe that information should be shared as widely as possible, others argue that certain information is too valuable to be made freely available. Both perspective are equally valuable.

Some researchers think that it is important to share information, it is important to let the general people know what they are doing. In scientific research, for example, researchers can build upon the discoveries of others, allowing them to develop new ideas and find solutions to existing problems. Similarly, the free exchange of academic knowledge enables student and teachers from different parts of the world to access valuable educational resources. In the business sector sharing ideas and expertise can also encourage innovation and improve productivity.

Therefore, making information widely available can benefit individuals as well as society as a whole.

On the other hand, there are reasonable arguments for keeping certain information confidential. People can misuse the information and can cause harm. For example, Alfred Nobel invented "dynamite" in 1867 to make the powerful liquid explosive nitroglycerin stable, safe to transport and practical to use for industrial and construction work. But later on it created tragedy and danger for people.

In conclusion, while sharing information promotes innovation and collective development, certain information deserves protection. I believe information should be shared whenever possible, provided that the rights and interests of it's creators are respected.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both positions and give a clear overall view: information should generally be shared, with creators’ rights and interests protected. The benefits are supported with relevant examples, including researchers building on discoveries and educational resources reaching students and teachers. However, the case for restricting access is less developed: the Nobel example illustrates possible harm, but the response does not explain which kinds of information should be protected or how confidentiality balances against public benefit. The opening claim that both perspectives are “equally valuable” also sits somewhat uneasily beside your final preference for sharing. The response is 10 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop these points. Clarifying your position and extending the opposing view would make the discussion more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph on the benefits of sharing, a contrasting paragraph on confidentiality, and a conclusion. Transitions such as “Similarly,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the discussion. The progression is generally logical, but cohesion is occasionally mechanical, and some links between claims could be clearer. For example, “Therefore” introduces a separate sentence after the benefits paragraph, making the point feel slightly detached rather than integrated into the paragraph’s reasoning. The repeated wording around sharing information also limits flow. Develop each main paragraph through a claim, explanation, and example, and connect the Nobel example explicitly to the principle of restricting sensitive information.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “development,” “exchange,” “innovation,” “productivity,” and “confidential.” These choices communicate the main ideas clearly, and phrases such as “build upon the discoveries of others” are appropriate to the academic context. There are, however, some imprecise or unnatural expressions: “general people” is not idiomatic, “Both perspective” has an incorrect form, and “powerful liquid explosive” is an awkward description. Repetition of “information,” “share,” and “important” also reduces variety. Aim for more precise collocations and vary key terms where appropriate, while keeping the language natural. The meaning remains understandable, but greater control of word choice would make the argument more fluent and exact.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “researchers can build upon the discoveries of others, allowing them to develop new ideas” and a conditional structure in the conclusion. Most sentences are understandable, but some grammatical errors remain. “Both perspective are” needs plural agreement, while “it’s creators” should be the possessive “its creators.” The sentence beginning “Some researchers think that it is important to share information, it is important to let…” joins two independent clauses with only a comma; recast it as one clause or separate it with a full stop. “Enables student and teachers” also needs plural agreement. Check agreement, possessives, and sentence boundaries, and use complex structures with consistent control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.