Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is often argued that people should share as much as possible information in enterpreneurship, edcational world and scientific research. Others are in favour that some most crucial and worthfull data should not be shared as free. I consider that every information should not be shared as free.

The first and foremost reason for not sharing the information is that, people have worked hard to attain all that data.Moreover, they have spend years of their life on a particular research topic or any bussiness. They must have the right that they should get payment to access their information. For instance, if their is a scientist who have worked days and night to discover the cause of polio virus, and to treat this. Theor hardwork should not have access to the people who did nothing.I believe that their hardwork mist get paid. Moreover, this way people will more value that information instead of taking it forgranted.It will encourage them to do this level of work so they can also earn money besides their personaal development.

On contrary there are some people who believe that informtion should be shared freely among everyone. Furthermore, they believe that it will help the people to achieve their goals who cannot afford the aubscription to content.For instance, if a person who is doing amazon if he post a series of lectures for free, so people with lower income can develop their kill. As a result they start their own bussiness or can secure a job.

To conclude, I strongly believe that people shoud gave access others to their important infornation in returm of little amount of money.Although, this amount should be as high that struggling students and employees could not bear the expenses.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both positions and state your own view clearly: you argue that valuable information should not be free, while acknowledging that free access can help people who cannot afford subscriptions. The examples about polio research and free business lectures are relevant and help explain each side. However, the discussion is uneven: the case for protecting information receives more explanation, while the benefits of sharing are mainly linked to affordability and career opportunities. Your conclusion also introduces a qualification—that the charge should remain affordable—which could be developed more fully in the main discussion. Explain more precisely when information should be protected and when wider access would benefit society.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. Signposting such as “Moreover,” “On contrary,” and “To conclude” helps readers follow the discussion. The progression within the first body paragraph is generally logical, moving from the effort involved in research to payment and motivation. However, some links are mechanical or unclear, and the second viewpoint is less fully connected to the central debate. For example, the Amazon lecture example needs a clearer explanation of how it supports free sharing of information. Use referencing more precisely and connect each example explicitly to the point it illustrates.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “scientific research,” “subscription,” “lower income,” and “personal development,” and the main ideas are usually understandable. However, the range is limited and several noticeable spelling and word-choice errors make parts difficult to read, such as “enterpreneurship,” “worthfull,” “informtion,” and “forgranted.” Some phrases are also unnatural, including “share as free” and “achieve their goals who cannot afford.” Aim for accurate collocations and check spelling carefully. More precise terms such as “intellectual property,” “research findings,” and “public access” would help you discuss the topic with greater clarity and flexibility.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including clauses beginning with “if” and “who,” and the overall meaning can generally be followed. However, errors in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction occur in several places. For example, “they have spend years” should use the past participle, and “there is a scientist who have worked” has an agreement error. The sentence beginning “For instance, if their is a scientist…” is also difficult to control and punctuate. Practise building accurate sentences with subordinate clauses, and check subject–verb agreement and verb forms before adding further clauses. Clearer sentence boundaries would improve readability.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.