Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-04

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is argued that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world, while others believe that some information is of serious nature and could not have open access. Although sharing all the important information is very beneficial for research students and scholars as it can provide a foundation for new research, I believe that some information related to invention of deadly weapons should not be published.

To beigin with, one of the main reasons why some people consider sharing all the information about various field of studies can play a crucial role. This is because, sharing all the information can help students and researcher to do more novel research by seeking help from current literature. As a result, new doors for inventions and discoveries may open. For example, if university student gain access to all the information relevant to verious fields, they will do more new experiments for progess and development of a country. Therefore, sharing all the possible information plays a pivotal role in lives of students and scholars.

On the other hand, I believe that some information should not be shared online and kept safe for security reasons. This is because some information related to invention of deadly weapon can be dangerous for the world and sharing such information online may be life threatening. Consequently, enemy of humanity can use it wrongly for their own benefits. For example, If information about nuclear weapons is available online, any country can use it to become a nuclear power. Therefore, keeping some information from public would be a step in the right direction towards the safety of humanity.

In conclusion, although sharing all the important information is very important for new research, I believe that some information related to inventions of deadly weapons should not be published online.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both positions and state a clear view: sharing information can support research, but information about deadly weapons should be restricted. The two body paragraphs are relevant, and the examples of university research and nuclear weapons help illustrate your points. However, the discussion is uneven: the benefits of sharing are explained in general terms, while the opposing view is mainly limited to security risks. The example that any country could use online nuclear-weapons information to become a nuclear power is not fully explained, so its support is unclear. To strengthen the response, develop the benefits with a more specific example and explain more precisely what kinds of valuable information should remain restricted and why.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion that restates your position. Ideas generally progress logically, and signposting such as “On the other hand” and “In conclusion” helps readers follow the argument. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical because several sentences rely on repeated patterns such as “This is because,” “As a result,” and “Therefore.” Some links also repeat rather than advance the reasoning. For example, the final sentence of the first body paragraph restates the value of sharing without adding a new point. Use a wider range of referencing and transitions, and make each concluding sentence show how the paragraph’s evidence supports your position.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “current literature,” “inventions and discoveries,” “security reasons,” and “nuclear weapons.” These choices make the subject clear, and phrases such as “a step in the right direction” show an attempt to use less common language. However, there are noticeable spelling and word-choice errors, including “beigin,” “verious,” and “progess.” Some collocations are also awkward, such as “information is of serious nature” and “enemy of humanity,” which reduce naturalness. Repetition of “information,” “important,” and “sharing” also limits flexibility. Aim for more precise academic phrasing and check spelling carefully; for instance, distinguish between information being “restricted” and being unavailable online.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including clauses with “although,” “because,” and “if,” and the main ideas remain understandable. Some sentence patterns are controlled, such as “Although sharing all the important information is very beneficial …, I believe …”. However, errors occur in agreement, articles, and sentence construction. For example, “university student gain access” needs plural agreement or an article, and “students and researcher” needs a plural noun. The opening phrase “one of the main reasons why … can play a crucial role” is incomplete in meaning, while “some information … could not have open access” has an awkward grammatical pattern. Review subject–verb agreement, articles, and complete clause structure, while continuing to use complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.