Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

People have different views about exchanging data and spreading information regarding scientific research, business and the academic world. Despite few drawbacks of sharing too research related data to the public, I firmly believe that everyone should be given a limited access to utilize information.

There are numerous positive benefits of sharing researched data to the commoners, the first possible reason is, faster progress and positive innovation can be estalished by spreading information to the people. Sharing research helps to speed up innovation as well as medical breakthroughs, therefore experts can work with a great collaboration to discover new medicines and antibiotics. Another reason is that, researchers can avoid duplication in the field of their examination as they get can avoid to invest their significant time and money to reinvent anything by accessing the database. Thirdly, it helps people to develop in economy and business, for instance, at the initial stage of a business, an entrepreneur can get valuable data without investing a good amount of money so that he can utilize the money in another fields.

Despite having benefits, sharing confidential data leads to vulnerability. One of the first reasons, it can hamper national security and public safety. For example, if malicious actors get the access to the dangerous researches such as bioweapons, nuclear weapon, and cybersecurity, they will try to attack and hazardous effect to the commoners of a state. Moreover, easy access to intellectual properties such as companies invest billion of money to they research and development department to have innovative production and trade secrets, can lead a great business damage and loss the organization.

In conclusion, i would say that sharing and exchanging information regarding research fields will improve the economy as well as boost the strength of national research and innovations but it should be limited to give the access of using valuable researched data.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

You address both sides of the discussion and state a clear position: information should be shared, but access to valuable research should be limited. The benefits paragraph gives relevant reasons, including faster innovation, avoiding duplicated research, and helping entrepreneurs; the risks paragraph also explains threats to public safety and companies’ intellectual property. These points are supported with examples, such as bioweapons and trade secrets, so the response develops the task rather than merely listing views. To strengthen the argument further, explain more precisely what “limited access” would mean—for example, which information should be open and who should control sensitive data. Some claims, particularly the economic benefit to entrepreneurs, would also benefit from a fuller explanation of how access produces that outcome.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response has a clear overall progression: an introduction presents your position, separate paragraphs discuss benefits and risks, and the conclusion restates your view. Signposting such as “Another reason,” “Moreover,” and “In conclusion” helps readers follow the argument, and the examples generally appear alongside the points they support. To make the progression more natural, avoid relying so heavily on numbered transitions such as “first” and “Thirdly”; connect ideas through their relationships instead. Some sentences also contain several ideas at once, particularly the sentence about researchers avoiding duplication, which makes the link between the claim and its explanation less smooth. Clearer sentence boundaries and more precise references would make the organisation feel more controlled.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “innovation,” “medical breakthroughs,” “national security,” “intellectual properties,” and “trade secrets.” These terms help you discuss both the benefits and risks of sharing information. You also attempt more formal phrasing, but some choices or combinations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “sharing researched data to the commoners,” “positive innovation,” and “a great business damage.” Spelling errors such as “estalished” also reduce accuracy. Aim to learn vocabulary in natural combinations and check word forms: for example, use “research data,” “the general public,” and “significant damage to a business.” This would make your meaning more precise while retaining the relevant range you already demonstrate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including clauses introduced by “as,” “if,” and “so that.” The overall meaning is usually understandable, but some grammatical errors make sentences difficult to follow. For example, “researchers can avoid to invest” needs a different verb pattern, and “companies invest billion of money to they research” has problems with number, possessive forms, and sentence structure. The sentence beginning “One of the first reasons” is also incomplete in its construction, while the opening sentence of the benefits paragraph joins clauses with a comma. Work on verb patterns, articles and plurals, and breaking long sentences into complete units. More consistent control of these basics would make your complex ideas clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.