Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Write about the following topic: Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

It is comtemplated that there should be transperancy between people and authorities. Supporter advocate that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world whereas others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. The essay will contend the both viewpoint along with my perpective in upcoming paragraphs.

To commence with, sharing information with multitudes is essential as it will spread awareness among people and tell what is happenning in the country. In business, it will encourage healthy competition which will automatically exclate company's profits and boast the economy. Moreover,in education system, it will raise educational standard by which learners can understand concept easily. It can lead to global collobration. Shared information helps international teams tackle massive, cross-border challenges—such as public health crises, climate change, and scientific mysteries—much faster than working in isolation.

Shifting towards the another side, some sort of information cannot be shared which can welcome the other problems. For example defense system, if any inm

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You introduce both views and give relevant reasons for sharing information, including competition, education and international cooperation on issues such as climate change. However, the response addresses the task only partially: the opposing view is cut off after “For example defense system, if any inm…”, and your own opinion is not stated. The ideas supporting openness are also asserted rather than explained with a specific example. The response contains 139 words, so it is 111 words below the required minimum; this leaves too little space to develop both sides and reach a reasoned conclusion. To improve, complete the argument about sensitive information, state your position clearly, and support each main point with an explanation or example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

There is an identifiable opening and a paragraph presenting reasons for sharing information, followed by a transition to the opposing view. Connectors such as “Moreover” and “Shifting towards the another side” show an attempt to guide the reader. However, the progression is incomplete: the final paragraph stops mid-sentence, and there is no conclusion to bring the discussion together or clarify your position. Some linking is also mechanical, with formulaic phrases such as “To commence with” and “Shifting towards.” Organise the response into a complete introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. Within each paragraph, make the relationship between a claim and its explanation explicit, and use referencing and transitions naturally.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “healthy competition,” “educational standard,” “global collaboration,” and “cross-border challenges.” These choices help communicate relevant ideas, and phrases such as “public health crises” are suitably specific. However, several spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision, including “comtemplated,” “transperancy,” “exclate,” “boast the economy,” and “collobration.” Some expressions are also unnatural or vague, such as “share information with multitudes” and “scientific mysteries.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations and check spelling carefully. For example, use “increase a company’s profits” rather than “exclate company's profits,” and choose “the public” or “a wide audience” instead of “multitudes.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use both simple statements and some longer structures, including a contrast introduced by “whereas” and a sentence explaining that shared information helps international teams address challenges. This shows an attempt to vary sentence forms. However, control is inconsistent: “Supporter advocate” has a number-agreement problem, “the both viewpoint” has an article and determiner problem, and “what is happenning” uses an incorrect verb form. There are also issues with articles and sentence construction in “Shifting towards the another side” and “In business, it will encourage…,” where the reference of “it” is unclear. Practise checking agreement, verb forms, articles and complete sentence structure, then proofread punctuation and spacing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.