Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-07-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The figure illustrate the Islip town map of current days and how it will looks after planned development. Now the town is more congested but after improvements it will be managed beautifully.

Initially the town now has a rough look there is the main road in between the town and shops are on both sides of the road. While when we move from east to west there is a path on the left it leads to the Park on the other hand when we come from west and going to east there is path on the right which goes to housing society as well and there is a school when we reached at curve of that road.

Whereas in the planned development of town road is given all around the town and the community is in between. Instead of old road it is converted to pedestrians path on the right side bus station, shopping center, car parking and even new housing society is structured while the people residing there don't have it now. On the left shops are in the same way. Behind the shop new housing society is also designed. School and park are still on same place.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response covers the main features of the maps, identifying the current layout and the proposed changes. However, the overview is weak; it lacks a clear summary of the most significant changes, such as the introduction of the bypass road and the expansion of residential areas. The description of the current town layout is somewhat confusing and lacks precision in spatial orientation. While the key features like the school and park are mentioned, the report would benefit from a more structured comparison between the 'before' and 'after' states to better highlight the transformation. The response addresses the task requirements but lacks the analytical depth required for a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organised into three paragraphs, which is a reasonable structure. However, the progression of ideas is sometimes difficult to follow due to awkward phrasing and a lack of clear cohesive devices. For instance, the transition between describing the current town and the planned development is abrupt. The use of linking words is limited and occasionally mechanical, such as 'Initially' and 'Whereas'. Referencing is sometimes unclear, making it difficult for the reader to track the specific locations being described. Improved use of cohesive devices and clearer paragraph transitions would enhance the logical flow of the report.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and variety expected at higher bands. There is some repetition of basic terms like 'town', 'road', and 'housing society'. The student attempts to describe the changes, but the word choice is often simplistic or slightly inaccurate, such as 'managed beautifully' or 'rough look', which are not appropriate for a formal report. To improve, the student should incorporate more specific vocabulary related to urban planning, such as 'pedestrianised', 'infrastructure', 'residential zone', and 'peripheral'.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The response contains a mix of simple and some complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Issues include subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'The figure illustrate'), tense inconsistencies (e.g., 'how it will looks'), and awkward sentence construction (e.g., 'road is given all around the town'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with several run-on sentences that lack necessary commas or conjunctions. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar prevents the response from reaching a higher band score.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.