Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-08-30

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

THE GRAPH ILLUSTRATE ABOUT THE ISLIP TOWN CENTER BEFORE AND AFTER THE DEVELOPMENT WHICH IS QUITE IMPRESSIVE.

MOVING AHEAD THE MAJOR CHANGES WE WOULD SEE AFTER THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE MORE NEW HOUSING WHICH MEANS THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WILL INCREASE AND PEOPLE WILL BUY THE PROPERTY WHERE AS IT WILL INCREASE THE RAPID GROWTH OF THE POPULATION.ON THE OTHER HAND THERE WILL BE AN DUAL CARRIAGEWAY WHICH WILL REDUCE THE TRAFFIC CONJESTION AS IT WILL NOW HAVE MORE PEOPLE AND HAVE DIFFEAS IT WILL HAVE MORE CHANGES WHICH WILL NEED TO BE MORE CONCIOUS AS NOW THEY WILL DIFFERNET CENTER AND SPOT.

ON THE OTHER HAND THERE WILL BE AND PEDESTRIANS ONLY WHICH COULD HELP THEM TO DETAIN MORE CURIOUS WHERE AS THERE WOULD BE AN CAR PARK SPOT WHERE NOW PEOPLE WOULD NOT HAVE ANY KIND OF PROBLEM RELATED TO CAR PARK WHERE AS IN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IT HAS VARIOUS CHANGES WHICH COULD ENHANCE THE BEAUTY OF THE TOWN.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response4.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource4.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy4.5
Overall4.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 4.0

The response fails to adequately summarize the main features of the maps. Instead of describing the spatial changes (e.g., the relocation of the bus station, the addition of a bypass, or the removal of shops), the text focuses on speculative social consequences like population growth and traffic congestion. The instructions require a report on the development plans, but the response lacks a clear overview and fails to identify key features such as the new housing areas or the pedestrianized zones accurately. The analysis is largely subjective rather than descriptive, which is inappropriate for an Academic Task 1 report.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The response is organized into paragraphs, but the progression of ideas is unclear. The use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or misused, such as the repetitive use of 'on the other hand' and 'where as', which do not logically connect the ideas presented. The sentences are often disjointed, and the lack of clear referencing makes it difficult for the reader to follow the comparison between the current and future town layouts. The structure lacks the logical flow required for a high-band response.

Lexical Resource — Band 4.5

The vocabulary is limited and frequently inaccurate. There are several spelling errors (e.g., 'CONJESTION', 'DIFFEAS', 'CONCIOUS', 'DIFFERNET') and word choice issues that impede clarity. The student relies on basic, repetitive vocabulary and struggles to use precise terminology related to urban planning or map description. Phrases like 'detain more curious' are nonsensical in this context. To improve, the student needs to focus on accurate spelling and using topic-specific vocabulary related to maps and development.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 4.5

The response contains frequent grammatical errors that often distort the intended meaning. There are issues with subject-verb agreement, incorrect article usage, and fragmented sentence structures. For example, 'THE GRAPH ILLUSTRATE' should be 'The graph illustrates', and 'THERE WILL BE AN DUAL CARRIAGEWAY' is grammatically incorrect. The range of structures is very limited, consisting mostly of simple sentences with errors in basic syntax. Punctuation is also inconsistent, with missing commas and improper capitalization throughout the text.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.