Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The following diagram illustrates the two kinds of maps which indicates the center of small town known as Islip.firstly looking at north,south,east and west side is shows that at the center point there is countryside on the main side of road there are shops then a link road below that there are multiples shops.Moving to west side of the road at the southwest side a school is present .In the center of school there are plenty of houses . Furthermore at the southeast point there is park.

Now looking at planned development there are bundles of changings such as at the at the north west side there will be bus station beside that station there will be shopping mall and a great car parking with it. At the north east a new housing scheme will be launch there will alink road that flows around park and school . At the center point there will be a pedestrians under that there are again multiple shops.

In contrast the developed plan is much facilitate than less develop owing to multiple reasons like avability of bus station,dual carriageway,new housing scheme which is a great difference . The provital develoment plan leads to more success than undeveloped because of much advantages to individuals.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify several relevant features, including the bus station, shopping centre, car park, new housing, pedestrian street and dual carriageway. However, the comparison is only partial and some locations are inaccurate or unclear. For example, the school is not in the southwest of the current map; it lies south of the town centre, while the park is to the southeast. The planned road is a loop around the centre, not simply a link road flowing around the park and school. You also miss important changes, such as the northern shops being replaced and the park becoming smaller. A concise overview of the main transformation, followed by accurate comparisons of the north and south, would make the response more complete and developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a basic sequence: it describes the current map, moves to the proposed plan, and ends with a comparison. Paragraph breaks help distinguish these stages, and phrases such as “Now looking at planned development” signal a transition. However, the progression within each section is difficult to follow because locations are described imprecisely and ideas are sometimes joined without clear relationships. The final paragraph shifts from map description to unsupported claims about success and advantages, which weakens the focus. Some linking expressions, including “Furthermore” and “In contrast,” do not clearly connect the information that follows. Organise the details by area or by major change, and use concise references to guide the reader through each map.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant map vocabulary, including “bus station,” “dual carriageway,” “new housing” and “pedestrians,” so the reader can recognise several planned features. However, the range is limited and a number of word choices or collocations are inaccurate, sometimes making the meaning unclear. “Bundles of changings” is not a natural way to describe the proposed alterations, while “a great car parking” and “the center of school” do not express the intended locations precisely. Spelling errors such as “avability” and “develoment” also reduce clarity. Aim for precise, neutral terms used in map reports, such as “development,” “car park,” “to the south of,” and “is replaced by,” rather than evaluative phrases about success or advantages.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts both simple and longer sentences, but control is inconsistent, and errors frequently make the descriptions harder to understand. For instance, “the two kinds of maps which indicates” has a subject–verb agreement error, and “there will alink road” has an article/spacing problem. Several sentences run together without appropriate punctuation, as in the opening description, while phrases such as “at the at the north west side” show weak editing. Tense and sentence patterns also need more consistent control when distinguishing the present map from the proposed plan. Practise clear comparative structures such as “The shops are replaced by a shopping centre” and “The park is reduced in size,” checking agreement, articles and sentence boundaries.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.