Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-18

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The islip town centre development maps looks well designed and is according to the modren day needs.The develpoment plan includes shoping centre with Parking facilities which is excellent approach to avoid any kind of traffic.The plan also includes bus station which is not in current plan the bus station will provide better & accesible transport to people of the town.Pedestrians way is also included which is great step for families and kids to walk freely without any danges providing safe enviroment.The development map also includes dual carriageway which will allow the residents less traffic issues.Both plans include parks which is neccesary in every town families and kids can come and spend their time in safe and peaceful enviroment.The development plan includes better parking facilities,transport facilities,better roads and ensuring a safe enviroment while the cureent maps lacks proper shopping center,parking faciltiies,pedestrians crossing and better roads.The developed map is much better plan.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion4.5
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify several genuine planned features, including the shopping centre, bus station, pedestrian-only route and dual carriageway, and you compare these with facilities in the current town. However, the response focuses mainly on whether the plan is beneficial rather than summarising the maps’ main changes. Important spatial information is missing: for example, the northern shops are replaced by facilities arranged from west to east, while the southern shops remain; new housing is added and the park becomes smaller. Some claims are not supported by the maps, such as saying the plan provides “pedestrians crossing” or that the new roads will reduce traffic. A clearer overview of the major changes, followed by accurate location-based details, would make the report more complete and map-focused.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response stays broadly on the topic and uses a few linking expressions, such as “also” and “while,” to connect points. However, it is presented as one continuous paragraph, so the reader cannot easily distinguish an overview from supporting details. The ideas also progress as a list of benefits rather than in a clear sequence comparing the current and planned layouts. Repeated openings such as “The development plan includes” make the organisation feel mechanical, and the final comparison repeats earlier points. Group the main changes into a short overview and a paragraph of specific map details, using clear references to locations and what is retained, replaced or added.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “shopping centre,” “bus station,” “dual carriageway” and “pedestrians,” so the reader can recognise several planned features. However, the range is limited and much of the wording evaluates the plan (“excellent,” “great step,” “much better”) rather than precisely describing map changes. Several spelling errors, including “modren,” “develpoment,” “accesible” and “enviroment,” are noticeable, and some phrases are imprecise or unnatural, such as “pedestrians crossing” and “safe environment” when describing the mapped route. Use more neutral, location-specific terms such as “is replaced by,” “is retained,” and “to the east of” to report the information accurately.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts to connect ideas in longer sentences, for example with “which” and “while,” but the range of sentence structures remains limited and errors occur frequently. The opening has subject–verb disagreement in “maps looks,” and several sentences run together without appropriate full stops or spacing, making the relationships between ideas harder to follow. Articles and sentence construction are also problematic in phrases such as “includes shoping centre” and “which is great step.” The present-tense forms are used inconsistently when describing planned changes, and the final sentence contains an unclear comparison between the developed map and the current map. Practise writing complete, punctuated sentences and use consistent forms such as “is planned to include” for future features.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.