Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-09-04
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The given bar chart illustrates how frequently people living in USA consumed fast food in restaurants between the time frame of 10 years.
Overall, through the bar chart we can note that, the timeline has been divided into 3: 2003,2006 and 2013. Also, the category of people has been distributed into six.
To begin with, the number of individuals that ate food from the restaurant daily were approximately at 5% for 10 years. Furthermore, there were humans in the region of 5% that never eat from restaurant during the years 2003 to 2013. Whereas, people that consumed fast food once a week and once or twice a month in eatery were around 25 to 35%, moreover in 2006 consumption of quick meal in once a week at dinning places was at the peak with roughly 35%, however in 2013 individuals that ate once or twice a month rose and dominated the proportion with around 35%. The percentage of people that ate serval times a week remained in 15 to 20% throughout the years. Last but not least people that consumed quick meal in restaurants were around 15%.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
You have successfully identified the main features of the chart and provided relevant comparisons. However, the report lacks a clear overview of the trends. While you mention the years and categories, you do not highlight the most significant changes, such as the stability of the 'daily' and 'never' categories versus the fluctuations in the 'once or twice a month' group. Additionally, the final sentence is vague ('people that consumed quick meal in restaurants were around 15%'), as it fails to specify which category this refers to, making the data reporting incomplete.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The response is organised into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the information. You use some cohesive devices like 'To begin with', 'Furthermore', and 'Whereas' to link ideas. However, the progression of information is somewhat mechanical. The transition between the introduction and the body paragraphs is abrupt, and the final sentence feels disconnected from the rest of the analysis. Improving the use of referencing (e.g., using 'the former' or 'the latter' instead of repeating 'people') would enhance the flow of your writing.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, such as 'illustrates', 'consumed', 'proportion', and 'dominated'. However, there are some awkward word choices and inaccuracies, such as 'humans in the region of 5%' (which sounds unnatural; 'a similar percentage' would be better) and 'eatery' or 'dinning places' (which are slightly informal or incorrectly used). To reach a higher band, focus on using more precise collocations and avoiding repetitive phrasing like 'people that consumed'.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
You use a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'never eat' (should be 'never ate' to match the past tense), 'in once a week' (preposition error), and 'serval' (spelling error). Additionally, some sentences are slightly clunky, such as 'the timeline has been divided into 3'. While these errors do not prevent the reader from understanding the data, they occur frequently enough to limit your score. Focus on subject-verb agreement and consistent tense usage.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
