Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-04

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

the provided bar graph illastrates the comparative data on the people of usa how they consume process food between 2003 to 2013. looking from an overall perspective, it is evident that once or twice was the thighest proportion and everyday was the lowest proportion, which was recorded during the given time period.

to commence with, everyday fast food eating routine was recorded about 4 in 2003, and it was almost 3 in 2006 and 2013. similarly, although at several time a week it was in the region of 17 in 2003, it was around of 20 in 2006, but it was near to 16 in 2013. after that, at once a week it was apprpoximately 31 in 2003, and it was 33 in 2006, which is the hieghest recorded ever. however, it was just under 28 in 2013.

om constrat, at once or twice it was roughly 30 in 2003, and it was close to 25 in 2006. nevertheless, it was considerably 33 in 2013. likewise, at a few timesa it sas about 13 in 2003, while it was just over 15 in both next years. eventhough it was about 5 in 2003, it 4 in next both recorded years.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by reporting the main features and making comparisons between the data categories across the years. An overview is attempted at the beginning, noting the highest and lowest proportions. However, some parts of the response are under-developed or contain unclear generalisations, such as stating that 'once or twice was the highest proportion' when the chart shows 'once a week' reached the peak in 2003 and 2006. Furthermore, some data references are imprecise or lack necessary units of measurement, which prevents the task achievement from reaching a higher level.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The text maintains a coherent overall arrangement with a recognisable introduction and body paragraphs. Paragraphing is used to separate the different categories of frequency. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical and referencing is occasionally faulty, with cohesive devices like 'to commence with', 'after that', and 'om constrat' applied rigidly. The progression of ideas across the response can feel slightly disjointed due to repetitive phrasing and minor organisational awkwardness, meaning it fits comfortably within the middle band for this criterion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, successfully attempting less common items and describing trends. However, there are notable spelling errors such as 'illastrates', 'thighest', 'apprpoximately', 'hieghest', 'om constrat', and 'sast'. Word choice and collocations are also imprecise at times, such as 'process food' instead of fast food. These vocabulary and spelling inaccuracies restrict the lexical score, though they generally do not completely impede communication.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, attempting comparative structures and relative clauses. There are some grammar and punctuation errors present throughout the text, including missing articles ('in 4', 'it 4 in next both'), awkward prepositions, and clumsy phrasing like 'at several time a week it was in the region of 17'. These errors occur regularly but rarely impede the overall communication of the data, placing the grammar performance securely within the current band.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.