Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-10
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Nowadays, in a number of countries, some people believe that it is essential to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for extremely fast trains between cities.Some alternative argue that the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. From my perspective, spend money on public transport can more beneficial, because individuals can travel from few income.
Initially, constructing new railway lines can benefits to human beings for go form one place to another. In addition, rush on the road may finish. Furthermore, individuals can easily travel from one place to another place.For instance, if people are travel from one city to another city,so new trains can more benefit and comfortable.In many development countries, such as Japan, China, and America are making to new bullet trains.Bullet trains are more and convenient for long distance as compared with old trains.Nevertheless,most people are comprehend to comfortable contemporary trains.
Secondly, money spent on improving existing public transport can give advantages to people.In some countries,most people face many challenges,when they go to offices, schools, hospitals,colleges and market.For examples, individuals utilize private local transport,when they go to long route.Furthermore, local transports take more time,when they travel from one place to another place.Consequently, government should to repair old public transports and build new railway transports.However, some in countries, government have no enough money to constructing new railway transports.it is the big reason, they have no firmly economy, most people do not pay tax.Therefore, government do not spend money on the old public transports.
To conclude, spend on a large sums of money on constructing new railway lines can be benefits to travel from one city to another city.As a result, spend money on old Public transport can give more amenities to go offices, schools,hospitals and supermarket.In my opinion,goverment should that assist people spend money on build new transport system and repire old public transports.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
You discuss both options and give a personal view, identifying benefits of fast trains and arguing that improving public transport can help people reach workplaces, schools and hospitals. However, the position is not consistently clear: the introduction favours existing transport, while the conclusion recommends both building new systems and repairing old ones without stating which should take priority. Several points are asserted rather than explained, such as the claim that new lines will reduce road congestion, and the discussion of limited government funds is difficult to connect to your main argument. Develop each view with a clear reason and a relevant example, then state a consistent judgement. The response meets the stated length requirement; 31 words copied from the task prompt were not counted.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Sequencing words such as “Initially,” “Secondly,” and “To conclude” help signal these stages. However, progression within paragraphs is often unclear, and linking expressions sometimes connect ideas without showing their precise relationship. For example, “Nevertheless” introduces a point about comfortable trains that does not clearly contrast with the preceding claim. Repeated phrases such as “one place to another” also make the development feel circular. Organise each body paragraph around one main claim, explain it, and then give a directly relevant example. Use pronouns or concise references where possible to avoid repeating the same wording.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “railway lines,” “public transport,” “bullet trains,” and “long distance,” so the subject is generally identifiable. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, sometimes making the intended meaning difficult to follow. Examples include “some alternative argue,” “travel from few income,” and “most people are comprehend to comfortable contemporary trains.” There are also spelling and word-form errors, such as “goverment” and “repire.” Aim to learn common transport collocations and check that each word expresses the intended idea. More precise terms for affordability, reliability, congestion and investment would help you explain the comparison clearly without relying on repeated general phrases.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and longer sentences, including clauses introduced by “because,” “when” and “if.” However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently in verb forms, agreement, articles and sentence construction, sometimes making relationships between ideas hard to understand. For example, “spend money on public transport can more beneficial” lacks a correctly formed subject and verb, while “new railway lines can benefits” has incorrect modal-verb agreement. In “if people are travel … so new trains can more benefit,” the verb forms and clause structure are faulty. Practise building accurate basic sentences first, then add subordinate clauses. Check that modal verbs take the base form, subjects agree with verbs, and each sentence has a complete, clearly punctuated structure.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.