Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Public transportation is crucial for moving one place to another . in a number of countries few individuals believe it is essential to spend huge sums of rupees on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities . iets discuss the both views and in order to get a concrete decission . i will discuss the both views in forthcoming paragraphs with the help of examples.

To commence with , railway lines are very beneficial for public because it reduce the time period . whereas the service is also good . many individuals saves their time to travel in train . the ticket of train are affordable for everyone . impoverished people also like to do travel in train "FOR EXAMPLE"- if a person has emergency so if he reach rapidly so he shoul use train to reach quickly . which is a advantage for himself . so giagantic number of money should be spend on build new railway lines in each city because it is very helpfull for human beings

on the other hand , i argue with my statement that it is vital to make healthy balance between all transportaion like train bus etc . some people feel comfortable in bus and for near place they never like to spend extra money in ticket "FOR INSTANCE " - if a person has some work in place which is near so he should use public transportation so public transportaion is important .

to recapitulate , in my opinion both are significant train as well as public transportaion and it really rely on people which they can use and both are right in their own way and both have merits as well as demerits.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address both sides of the discussion and give a general view that both rail and other public transport matter. The first body paragraph supports new railway construction with speed and affordability, while the next introduces the value of buses for shorter journeys. However, the task is only partially developed: the comparison with improving existing transport is not clearly explained, and the examples are hypothetical and repetitive rather than showing specific benefits or trade-offs. Your position also shifts: “I argue with my statement” is unclear, and the conclusion says both options are right without stating which investment you consider more important or under what circumstances. Develop each view with a distinct reason and make your own preference explicit throughout.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting different views, and a conclusion, so the reader can identify its broad structure. You also use signposts such as “To commence with,” “on the other hand,” and “to recapitulate.” However, progression within paragraphs is weak: several points are joined together without showing how they relate, and the first paragraph moves from speed to ticket affordability and then to an emergency example. Some linking is mechanical or inaccurate, including “whereas” and “so” in the first body paragraph. The conclusion repeats that both options have merits rather than drawing the discussion together. Use clearer topic sentences and connect each reason to its explanation and example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant transport vocabulary, including “railway lines,” “public transportation,” “ticket,” and “affordable,” which makes the topic understandable. However, the range is limited and several words or phrases are repeated, particularly “important,” “people,” and “both.” There are also noticeable spelling and word-choice problems, such as “transportaion,” “helpfull,” “giagantic,” and “decission.” Some expressions are unnatural or imprecise, for example “do travel in train” and “make healthy balance.” These choices sometimes make the intended meaning less clear. Build a more precise set of topic phrases and check spelling and collocations; for instance, describe investment as “funding” and refer to “commuters” or “passengers” rather than repeating “people.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, but the range is limited and complex attempts are often faulty. Errors in agreement and verb forms occur in phrases such as “it reduce the time period,” “many individuals saves,” and “should be spend.” Articles, plurals, and sentence construction also need attention: “the ticket of train are affordable” and “if he reach rapidly so he shoul use train” are difficult to follow. Capitalisation and punctuation are inconsistent, with sentence openings in lowercase and quotation marks used around examples. These frequent errors can make the reader pause, even though the general topic remains understandable. Practise accurate simple sentences first, then combine ideas using one controlled subordinate clause at a time.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.