Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-07-26

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

some people argue that government body ought to invest money in railway infrastructure between cities for fast communication. where as some are in favour of using money to enhance present public transport.

on the one hand, bunch of citizen thinks that there ought to be new railway lines for fast train between the cities because they believe that in urban time every want to reach their destination as fast as possible.so if there is new railway line for fast train it helps to reduce crowd and save time for man commucating people. Our old trains are geting damaged because of long time peroid. for instance, I used to travels in local train during may education .sometimes because of heavy rush in train I could not reach my college in time.so at that having another faster option would have help me a lot.

on the other hand, there are communities who argue that when we already have transporting vessels why bothers to have another and waste nation's treasure , which is also true to some extent. Rather than investing in new railway tracks for fast travelling that fortune can be use in developing area with basic healthcare system and education. There are lot more places in country which need basic lacks basic healthcare system which leads to higher mortality rate there are many area in the nation who has number of children who can not have proper education because scaresity of schools.

in conclusion ,i would say that having new railway track for fast train will be of huge help but having said we can not neglect amount of money it require which can also use in different area for further development.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a personal opinion, meeting the basic requirements of the task. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. While you mention the need for fast trains to reduce crowds and the alternative of investing in healthcare and education, these points are not fully extended with sophisticated reasoning or specific, well-integrated examples. The conclusion is present but lacks a clear, decisive summary of your final stance. To reach a higher band, ensure that each body paragraph provides a deeper analysis of the implications of each choice rather than just stating the benefits or drawbacks.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organised into logical paragraphs, which helps the reader follow your argument. However, the use of cohesive devices is somewhat mechanical and occasionally repetitive. For instance, the transition between ideas within paragraphs could be smoother. There are also issues with punctuation and sentence structure that occasionally disrupt the flow of information. Referencing is sometimes unclear, such as in the phrase 'when we already have transporting vessels', which is an awkward way to refer to existing public transport. Improving the variety of linking words and ensuring clear logical progression between sentences would enhance the coherence of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary used is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and range required for higher bands. There are several instances of awkward word choices, such as 'urban time' instead of 'modern times', 'man commucating people' (likely meaning commuters), and 'nation's treasure' instead of 'public funds'. Additionally, there are spelling errors like 'geting', 'peroid', 'scaresity', and 'commucating'. To improve, focus on learning collocations related to infrastructure and public policy, and proofread carefully to eliminate basic spelling mistakes that detract from your overall performance.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay relies heavily on simple sentence structures. While there are attempts at complex sentences, they are often marred by grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('there are many area', 'which has number of children') and missing articles. Punctuation is also inconsistent, with several run-on sentences and missing spaces after periods. These errors occur frequently throughout the text. To improve, you should practice using a wider variety of complex structures, such as conditional sentences or relative clauses, while ensuring that basic grammatical rules regarding plurals and articles are applied consistently.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.