Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-07-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Through different forms of print and digital media we come across report that nowadays transports part of our life. One school of thoughts emphasises that some people think that spend large sums money in constructing new railway. Conversely there is an argument that spend money on improving existing public transport. After scrutiny of both the side i support latter view.

Those who believe in the former view put forward solid reasons. To begin with constructing new railway line for very fast train between city it is make people life more easy. This view exits as many people do job, study and other work therefore they have busy time scedule so it is time consuming transport. In addition to these, build new railways improve transport facelities and also convert city to smart city. As result, it is essential for great cities.

However, who believe againts the former view, improving existing public transport is necessary because old damage transports create many accidents and it not constructed properly therefore first of all it is very important to improve. Moreover, old transport system some where dangerous for people so spend money on old transport is good thing.

My inclination can be bolastared with reality that, Many cities faced crises on transport people can suffering to time management due to bad public transports system therefore improving existing transport it is beneficial for people.

In conclusion, down the lane, transport system should improve rapidly. it is recomanded that, care our existing and new developed railway it is our duties and government should spend according actual reqiurements.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both views and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is limited. For example, the argument for high-speed trains is underdeveloped, relying on vague phrases like 'make people life more easy' and 'convert city to smart city' without explaining how or why. Similarly, the argument for improving existing transport is repetitive and lacks specific examples or logical depth. While the prompt is addressed, the ideas are not fully extended, which prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. To improve, focus on providing concrete examples or logical consequences for each point made.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organised into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate. Phrases like 'In addition to these' and 'As result' are used, but the flow between sentences is frequently interrupted by grammatical errors and awkward phrasing. The transition between the introduction and the body paragraphs is somewhat abrupt. While there is an overall progression, the lack of sophisticated linking words and the repetitive nature of the arguments make the cohesion feel somewhat basic and occasionally disjointed.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is limited and often repetitive. There are several instances of word-choice errors and non-standard collocations, such as 'report that nowadays transports part of our life' and 'bolastared with reality'. The student relies on simple, high-frequency words, and there is little evidence of an attempt to use less common lexical items or idiomatic language. Spelling errors, such as 'scedule', 'facelities', 'againts', and 'recomanded', are frequent and occasionally distract the reader, though they do not fully impede communication.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a high frequency of grammatical errors, including issues with subject-verb agreement ('transports part of our life'), article usage, and sentence structure. Many sentences are fragmented or lack necessary prepositions, such as 'some people think that spend large sums money'. While there is an attempt to use complex structures, they are often faulty, leading to a lack of clarity. The majority of sentences contain errors, which forces the reader to work harder to understand the intended meaning. A focus on basic sentence construction and proofreading for subject-verb agreement is essential.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.