Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-08-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In the contemporary era, due to the enhancement in people's live, it is argued by one School of thought that it is extreme way to spend bundle of money toward railway line for quicker train between cities, while, others think that that money ought to consume for advancement of current public transport.Therefore, I will discuss both the writers' notion and render supportive causes of it with appropriate consequences in the upcoming paragraphs and at the end, my opinion will be drawn in the conclusion.

To commence with, on the one hand, certain facilities give suggestions that in this fast growing world, we need to spend uncountable money to betterment of railway lines for fast transportation.The main reason of it is that significant convenient for users.To elaborate it, railway lines act vital role in people's day to day life style as everyone use it in various ways such as commuting for work, visiting different cities and many more.If we will invest lots of money on it, this will not only easy way of transport with high speed but also it will reduce most of the time which people are contributing for travelling.

On the other hand, plethora of society believe that existing transportation mode need more attention for improvement.There are number of reasons for it.Firstly, there are fewer amenities on the platforms of public transport.Which we can fulfile by providing extreme funds.as a result, it will beneficial for people.Apart from this, there are few public vehicles on the road due to which communities require lot of time to wait for it on platform.By investing amount of money to increase the number of vehicles then it will helpful for them.For an example, In India around 500 billions covered by authority to install new buses for passenger.

In conclusion, in my point of view I believe that though railway lines is better enhancement as a fastest mode of. transport, there are possible reasons which reflects necessity to development of existing public transport which we can mitigate by putting sums of money.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a personal opinion, meeting the basic requirements of the prompt. However, the development of ideas is somewhat superficial. For example, the argument for high-speed rail is limited to 'convenience' and 'time-saving' without exploring broader economic or environmental impacts. Similarly, the points regarding existing public transport are repetitive and lack depth. While the position is clear, the supporting arguments would benefit from more specific, logical elaboration rather than general statements. The conclusion is present but lacks a strong summary of the main points discussed.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organised into clear paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate. Phrases like 'To commence with' and 'Apart from this' are used, but the logical flow between sentences is sometimes disrupted by awkward phrasing. Referencing is occasionally unclear, such as in the sentence 'Which we can fulfile by providing extreme funds', where the relative pronoun does not clearly link to the previous idea. The progression of ideas is present but feels somewhat disjointed due to the repetitive nature of the sentence structures.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks precision and variety. There is a reliance on informal or imprecise phrasing, such as 'bundle of money', 'uncountable money', and 'extreme funds'. Some collocations are unnatural, such as 'give suggestions' instead of 'argue' or 'propose'. While the student attempts to use a range of vocabulary, the word choice is often repetitive and occasionally inaccurate, which limits the ability to convey more complex ideas with nuance. More precise terminology related to infrastructure and urban planning would improve the score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede readability. Issues include subject-verb agreement ('everyone use it'), incorrect article usage, and awkward sentence construction ('railway lines act vital role'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with some sentences ending abruptly or lacking necessary commas. While the meaning is generally clear, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. The student should focus on sentence structure and ensuring that complex sentences are grammatically sound.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.