Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-08-21
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Nowadays, many nations are spending large amount of money to build infrastructure facilities. A few individuals state that it is necessary to spend large amount of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. While, others state that money should be spent on improving existing public transport. This essay will discuss both the views and validate my opinion that many nations are spending more money to improve infrastructure facilities for the beneficial of society.
On the one hand, A few citizens think that it is necessary to spend large sums of money on building new railway lines for very fast trains between trains. However, these are very important thing to the society to improve such new facilities because new implementation is needed for the nation to be develop. For example, In America, government is providing new implementation facilities such as new railway lines, new airports and other facilities for the beneficial of societies. As a result, it is very important to build a innovative thing to the society as it will improve the development of the nation to become strong and more stable.
On the flip side, others think that money should be spend on improving existing public transport because many nations infrastructure is very poor and the government is not taking any initiative actions to overcome such situations. However, some nations are not bothering about public because majority of the public transport is getting weird and lot of complaints are told by people. For example, In India, most of the public transport is not correctly maintained properly and there are more consequences is reporting about public transports in India because the service are cheap and not good.
In conclusion, A few individuals state that it is necessary to spend large amount of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. While, others state that money should be spent on improving existing public transport. As a result, some nations are spending more money on constructing infrastructure facilities for the beneficial of the society.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
The response addresses both views and provides an opinion, but the development of ideas is limited. The arguments are repetitive and lack depth. For instance, the discussion on high-speed trains relies on vague statements like 'new implementation is needed for the nation to be develop' without explaining the specific economic or social benefits. Similarly, the second body paragraph mentions poor public transport but fails to link this effectively to the debate about whether funds should be diverted. The conclusion merely restates the prompt rather than synthesising the arguments. To improve, you should provide more specific reasoning and concrete examples that directly support your position.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organised into paragraphs, which is a positive feature. However, the progression of ideas is often unclear due to the repetitive nature of the sentences. Cohesive devices are used, but they are often mechanical or misused, such as starting sentences with 'While, others...' or 'However, these are very important thing...'. The referencing is sometimes confusing, and the transition between ideas is not always logical. To achieve a higher band, focus on using a wider variety of linking words and ensuring that each sentence flows naturally from the previous one, rather than relying on repetitive structures.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is limited and often repetitive, with phrases like 'spend large amount of money' and 'beneficial of the society' appearing multiple times. There are also issues with word choice and collocation, such as 'getting weird' to describe public transport and 'consequences is reporting'. These errors occasionally make the meaning less clear. To improve, you should aim to use a broader range of vocabulary, including less common lexical items, and pay closer attention to how words are used in context. Avoid repeating the same phrases throughout the essay.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The essay contains a mix of simple and some attempted complex structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors. Common issues include subject-verb agreement ('consequences is reporting'), article usage, and incorrect word forms ('nation to be develop'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with the placement of commas. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors prevents the writing from reaching a higher band. You should focus on mastering basic sentence construction and proofreading for common errors like pluralisation and verb tense consistency.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.