Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-09-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In numerous notions, many individuals think it is require to spend huge amount of funds on developing new railway tracks for very fast trains to connect cities. while others believe that the money should be spend on enhancing existing public transportation facilities. I accordance with the latter aspect. The narrative ahead shall articulate both these views before arriving to a rational conclusion

On the one hand, those fast trains save more time during travelling and it also attracts tourism and foreign investment. Due to, modern rapid technologies and developments and future opportunity as well, and also it can be beneficial for country. As a result, this type of train service can increase countries revenue from many sides such as tourism, international investment and migration of workers from various towns. To cite an example, bullet train china is very popular for the speed and their design

On the other hand, improving existing facilities are save land, time and also amount of money. This is because, further developments requires acers of land and more time. Thus, those redevelopments on existing lines can not decrease the farming lands and also saves funds and time. For instance, most of train developments redeveloped on old lines in India

To sum up, in line with the views presented above, it is evident that both these views hold on to their respective positions and sense of relevance. I however am of the outlook that improvement on existing tracks can be beneficial and time saving development for those small notions

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, the argument regarding fast trains mentions 'tourism' and 'investment' but lacks specific explanation of how these are achieved. Similarly, the point about existing infrastructure is valid but remains superficial. The essay meets the requirements of the prompt, but the supporting arguments are not fully extended, which prevents it from reaching a higher band. The position is consistent throughout, and the conclusion effectively summarizes the writer's stance.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'On the one hand', 'On the other hand', and 'To sum up', which help guide the reader. However, some transitions are mechanical or slightly awkward, such as 'Due to, modern rapid technologies'. Additionally, the referencing is sometimes unclear, and the flow between sentences within paragraphs could be smoother. While the overall structure is coherent, the use of cohesive devices is not always flexible or natural.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but it lacks the precision and range required for a higher band. There are several instances of awkward word choices or incorrect collocations, such as 'In numerous notions' (likely meaning 'nations') and 'acers of land' (spelling error for 'acres'). The range of vocabulary is somewhat repetitive, relying on basic terms like 'money', 'time', and 'developments'. To improve, the student should focus on using more sophisticated synonyms and ensuring correct word forms and collocations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Examples include 'it is require to spend', 'money should be spend', and 'most of train developments redeveloped'. Subject-verb agreement and verb tense consistency are problematic throughout the text. While the writer attempts complex structures, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar limits the score. More attention to proofreading and mastering fundamental sentence construction is necessary.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.