Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-09-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In some nations, a small number of people believe that it is crucial to spent significantly amount of money on build the railway tracks for trains, which helps to train accessible in every city, while other argued that public transport is more essential , thus government should spend their money on it. In this essay, first i will discuss both the perspectives then deduce my own opinion.

Proponents of the first viewpoint contain that, government should spent money on construct the railway lines. First and foremost, it is clear that if government spend huge amount of money on railway department, so the working people who commuting daily will be more convenient. Even they may more balance their professional and personal life. Moreover, if railway facilities are provide in every city it may higher chance individuals travel by train rather than their personal vehicles. As a result, environment will be more breathtaking or more than half diseases will be extinct.

Advocates of the second viewpoint maintain that, government will be more attention to improve to public transportation. To commence with, if government will spend money on new buses and other transportation vehicle especially on country side areas development, it will improve their quality life. In addition, in many nations there are numerous areas where people have not enough transport method if authorities improves people may work more effectively and it might also boost the country economy.

In conclusion, it is evident from the above discussion that, public transport improvement will help to rural area people have relable source for travelling, while trains available more effec

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses both viewpoints and provides an opinion, though the conclusion is incomplete, which affects the overall development of the position. The ideas are relevant, such as the environmental benefits of trains and the economic impact of rural transport, but they are somewhat under-developed. For example, the claim that 'more than half diseases will be extinct' is an over-generalization that lacks logical support. To improve, ensure that each point is fully explained with clear reasoning and that the conclusion effectively summarizes the main arguments and restates the opinion clearly.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate, such as 'Proponents of the first viewpoint contain that' (should be 'contend') and 'To commence with'. The referencing is sometimes unclear, and the flow between sentences is occasionally disjointed. The conclusion is cut off abruptly, which disrupts the logical progression of the argument. Improving the variety and accuracy of linking words and ensuring a complete, coherent conclusion would significantly enhance the score.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is generally limited and repetitive. There are frequent errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'spent significantly amount of money' (should be 'a significant amount') and 'transport method' (should be 'modes of transport'). The phrase 'environment will be more breathtaking' is an inappropriate collocation in this context. While the student attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary, the lack of precision and the presence of basic errors hinder the expression of more complex ideas. Expanding the range of vocabulary and focusing on correct word forms is essential.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede communication. Issues include incorrect verb forms ('spent' instead of 'spend'), missing articles, and faulty sentence structures, such as 'if government spend... so the working people... will be more convenient'. There is a limited range of complex structures, and those attempted often contain errors. Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with comma usage. To improve, the student should focus on subject-verb agreement, correct tense usage, and the accurate construction of conditional sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.