Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-09-27

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 4.5)

In a number of regions, a few individulas think that its is essential to allocate big figure of money on builting new railways tracks for very fast trains between cities. Other think the funds should be spent on enhancing under useful public transport. In this eaasy I will discuss both views and I give my personal aspect.

To begin with, one of the main reason behind this issue is some people believe that builting a new railways is very imporatnt for people because they think new lines modern and we travel comfortable. This is because it has a significant impact on people daily lives. For example, some people want to built new railways in their country because they explain different varities of new technology.As a result, individuals experience severals benefits or face different situation in railway. Moreover, this can also contribute to the new development of society. Therefore, its is importatnt to understant this new development builting new railways aspect carefully before reaching a final conclusion.

Furthermore, another important point to consider is other people believe that funds should be spent on enhancing existing public transport. In today modern world, this is issue has become increasingly important for those poeple that they not prefer to builting new public transports. For instance, other beliver that every government should focused on helth services,education and other mostly using services they believe that government should spent a less amount on public transport to just improving. In addition,taking appropriate steps can help to improve the situation and achieve positive result.

In my opinion, bothe views correct in their own ways but I prefer to government should spent fund only improving public transport because our government should not focusing helth and education.

In conclusion, both view are coerrect in their own aspect both explain thier benefits what the causes or what the benefits.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses both views regarding high-speed rail and improving existing public transport, and the student presents a personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is limited and often repetitive. Phrases like 'some people think it is very important for people because they think new lines modern and we travel comfortable' lack depth and logical extension. The student's position is clear in the conclusion and body paragraphs, but the arguments remain underdeveloped, touching upon ideas superficially without exploring broader socio-economic or environmental implications. Therefore, this performance aligns closely with Band 5, where the task is addressed, but ideas remain limited and under-developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay is organized into distinct paragraphs with basic introduction and conclusion structures. However, the overall progression is heavily disrupted by repetitive phrasing and weak cohesive devices. The links between sentences often feel mechanical or inaccurate, such as starting multiple sentences with 'This is because' or 'For example' followed by ideas that do not clearly illustrate the preceding statement. Paragraphing is attempted, but internal paragraph cohesion is weak. Pronoun referencing is frequently unclear, as seen in phrases like 'this is issue has become increasingly important for those poeple that they not prefer'. These characteristics reflect Band 5, where there is some organization and paragraphing, but overall progression is unclear and cohesive devices are inadequate or inaccurate.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The vocabulary used is basic and repetitive, frequently impeded by numerous spelling and word-choice errors. Examples include 'individulas', 'its is', 'big figure of money', 'builting', 'eaasy', 'imporatnt', 'severals', 'varities', 'helth', and 'bothe'. The student attempts less common items like 'allocate' and 'enhance', but these are often misused or misspelled (e.g., 'enhancing under useful public transport'). The lexical range is limited and minimally adequate for conveying basic meaning, though errors cause significant difficulty for the reader at times. This corresponds to a Band 4, bordering on Band 5 due to some attempts at topic-related vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0

The essay displays a very limited range of grammatical structures, with frequent errors that persistently strain the reader's comprehension. Simple sentences dominate, and attempts at complex structures are consistently faulty, such as 'In my opinion, bothe views correct in their own ways but I prefer to government should spent fund only improving public transport because our government should not focusing helth and education.' There are widespread errors in verb forms, prepositions, subject-verb agreement, and basic sentence construction throughout the text. Punctuation and word order are also frequently problematic. These widespread, frequent errors that often distort meaning place this response squarely in Band 4.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.