Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In recente years, an increasing number of countries, a considerable number of people argue that it is madatory to spend a large amount of capital on constructing new railway lines for the fast transition among different cities in the country. While the opposition hold a slightly similar view that these funds should be spent to enhance the existing railway lines for public transport. This essay will discuss both perspectives before explaining why I believed a balanced approach is the most beneficial.

On the one hand, a growing number of people want to constructe new railway lines due to fast transition between cities. To elaborate further, they aruge that whenever the authority invest in new lines then updated system should be installed in cities which meet the expectation of this modern world. Likewise, updated railway lines must have a proper safety sytems, in the case of accident. Alongside, safety is very important aspect for individuals lives to be consider the most crucial term in railway lines which might not be the old railways. Therefore, new railways lines is need to be constructed for fast delivery and to improve safety. For instance, Bullet train in Japan have very advanced automation system and very hight speed compared to the old existing one, which is only only safe but also consume very marginal energy for transpotation.

On the other hand, critics argue that the government should need to invest the same amount on the existing railway lines because to save time and money. To explain on it, constructing new system from scratch required a vast amount of time as well as a considerably amount of time. Therefore, if the authority invest a very minimal portion of budget on the existing railways then it will be more beneficial and very affordable. Moreover, constructing new railways can also affect sustainalbe development which is the most considerable issue in today modern world. Hence, it is quite easy and convenient for government to invest the same funds on the existing railways to improved their quality, speed, and safety.

In conclusion, although investing in updated railway lines in the order to improved fast transition and safety, while speding the same capitals for existing one is also beneficial in terms to save time and money as well as to keep the sustainable development continuous. From My point of view a balanced approach is most beneficial for investing some funds in new railways to create fast delivery and imporve safety, and also invest some portion of money on the existing one to improve their quality and speed.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the discussion and state a clear position: “a balanced approach is the most beneficial.” The essay gives relevant reasons for new lines, including speed and safety, and for upgrading existing services, including saving time and money and supporting sustainable development. The Japan bullet-train example adds useful support. However, some points are asserted rather than explained: for example, the claim that new lines require updated systems is not clearly connected to why they should be built, and the environmental effect of new construction is mentioned without an example or explanation. Develop these ideas with specific consequences or evidence, and make the comparison behind your balanced recommendation more explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for each view, and a conclusion that returns to your position. Signposting such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” makes the progression easy to follow. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some of the flexibility associated with stronger cohesion. However, several links are mechanical or do not express the relationship precisely: “Therefore” and “Hence” sometimes introduce conclusions that have not been fully established. Some sentences also contain unclear references, such as “the same amount” and “the existing one.” Use more precise transitions and name the transport system or investment being referred to, while ensuring each supporting point follows logically from the previous one.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “constructing new railway lines,” “automation system,” “sustainable development,” and “public transport.” These choices show an effort to discuss the issue beyond basic terms. However, noticeable spelling, word-form, and collocation errors reduce precision and sometimes make the reader pause: examples include “madatory,” “fast transition,” “safety sytems,” and “marginal energy.” Some expressions are also repeated, particularly “existing railways” and “beneficial.” Aim for accurate, natural combinations and check spelling carefully. Replacing vague phrases with specific terms such as “high-speed rail,” “upgrade existing services,” and “reduce energy consumption” would make the argument clearer and more appropriately academic.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use both simple and complex sentence forms, including a concession in the introduction and clauses beginning “whenever” and “because.” This gives the essay some structural variety, and the main ideas are generally understandable. However, errors in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction occur across the response. For example, “the authority invest” needs subject–verb agreement, “new railways lines is need to be constructed” has several agreement and verb-form problems, and “although investing … while spending” does not form a complete, balanced sentence. Review singular and plural subjects, article use, and the structure of contrast clauses. Building accurate sentences first, then adding subordinate clauses, will help you retain variety without losing control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.